Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31498825›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Antibody response in snakes with boid inclusion body disease.

Katharina Windbichler, Eleni Michalopoulou, Pia Palamides, Theresa Pesch, Christine Jelinek, Olli Vapalahti, Anja Kipar, Udo Hetzel, Jussi Hepojoki

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Experimental Reptarenavirus Infection ofJournal of virology · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Katharina WindbichlerInstitute of Veterinary Pathology, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Eleni MichalopoulouDepartment of Veterinary Pathology and Public Health, Institute of Veterinary Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Pia PalamidesInstitute of Veterinary Pathology, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Theresa PeschInstitute of Veterinary Pathology, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Christine JelinekInstitute of Veterinary Pathology, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Olli VapalahtiUniversity of Helsinki, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Veterinary Biosciences, Helsinki, Finland.
Anja KiparInstitute of Veterinary Pathology, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Udo HetzelInstitute of Veterinary Pathology, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Jussi HepojokiInstitute of Veterinary Pathology, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5699-214X
University of Helsinki · FIUniversity of Zurich · CHUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Boid Inclusion Body Disease (BIBD) is a potentially fatal disease reported in captive boid snakes worldwide that is caused by reptarenavirus infection. Although the detection of intracytoplasmic inclusion bodies (IB) in blood cells serves as the gold standard for the ante mortem diagnosis of BIBD, the mechanisms underlying IB formation and the pathogenesis of BIBD are unknown. Knowledge on the reptile immune system is sparse compared to the mammalian counterpart, and in particular the response towards reptarenavirus infection is practically unknown. Herein, we investigated a breeding collection of 70 Boa constrictor snakes for BIBD, reptarenavirus viraemia, anti-reptarenavirus IgM and IgY antibodies, and population parameters. Using NGS and RT-PCR on pooled blood samples of snakes with and without BIBD, we could identify three different reptarenavirus S segments in the collection. The examination of individual samples by RT-PCR indicated that the presence of University of Giessen virus (UGV)-like S segment strongly correlates with IB formation. We could also demonstrate a negative correlation between BIBD and the presence of anti-UGV NP IgY antibodies. Further evidence of an association between antibody response and BIBD is the finding that the level of anti-reptarenavirus antibodies measured by ELISA was lower in snakes with BIBD. Furthermore, female snakes had a significantly lower body weight when they had BIBD. Taken together our findings suggest that the detection of the UGV-/S6-like S segment and the presence of anti-reptarenavirus IgY antibodies might serve as a prognostic tool for predicting the development of BIBD.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, ViralArenaviridaeArenaviridae InfectionsFemaleInclusion Bodies, ViralMaleSnakesAntibodies, Viral

Identifiers

PMID31498825
PMCPMC6733472
OpenAlexW2973094707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.