Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31498204›Full record

ArticleJournal of healthcare management / American College of Healthcare Executives

Professional Satisfaction of Advanced Practice Providers in Primary Care Specialties.

Danielle J O'Laughlin, Jennifer A Bold, Darrell R Schroeder, Petra M Casey

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of healthcare management / American College of Healthcare Executives. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Danielle J O'LaughlinDivision of Primary Care Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota Department of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota assistant professor of biostatistics, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Jennifer A Bold
Darrell R Schroeder
Petra M Casey

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

executive summaryThis prospective study focuses on professional satisfaction among advanced practice providers (APPs) in primary care. We aimed to determine whether incorporating specialty care clinics within primary care practices increases professional satisfaction. We administered the validated Misener Nurse Practitioner Job Satisfaction Scale and a self-developed demographic questionnaire to all primary care APPs before and one year after implementation of a gynecology practice within the primary care setting. APPs practicing in a dual-role specialty practice reported higher overall professional satisfaction; professional growth; intrapractice partnership/collegiality; professional, social, and community interaction; and benefits than their primary care-only counterparts. We concluded that professional satisfaction among APPs may contribute to staff retention.

Indexed as

Job SatisfactionPersonal SatisfactionPrimary Health CareFemaleHumansInterprofessional RelationsMaleNurse PractitionersProfessional AutonomyProspective StudiesSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID31498204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.