Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31498030›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2019

Treatment-Free Survival: A Novel Outcome Measure of the Effects of Immune Checkpoint Inhibition-A Pooled Analysis of Patients With Advanced Melanoma.

Meredith M Regan, Lillian Werner, Sumati Rao, Komal Gupte-Singh, F Stephen Hodi, John M Kirkwood, Harriet M Kluger, James Larkin, Michael A Postow, Corey Ritchings and 5 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Review
  14. Outcomes of Nivolumab-Plus-Ipilimumab in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Second Interim Analysis of the J-ENCORE Study.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2026
    Observational
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. National Cancer Institute's Working Group on Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer: Clinical Trial Design Considerations.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Meredith M ReganDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Lillian WernerDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Sumati RaoBristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ.
Komal Gupte-SinghBristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ.
F Stephen HodiDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
John M KirkwoodUniversity of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA.
Harriet M KlugerYale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT.
James LarkinThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Michael A PostowMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Corey RitchingsBristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ.
Mario SznolYale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Ahmad A TarhiniEmory University and Winship Comprehensive Cancer Center, Atlanta, GA.
Jedd D WolchokMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Michael B AtkinsGeorgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC.
David F McDermottHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
VectorP30CA006516 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI A. Heather Eliassen · 1985 to 2026
$330.6M
Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Treating the P13-Kinase/AKTP50CA101942 · NCI · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI Wanling Xie · 2003 to 2026
$53.4M
Yale SPORE in Skin CancerP50CA121974 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI DAVID F STERN · 2006 to 2026
$43.9M
Renalase inhibition for treatment of unresectable melanomaR01CA216846 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI DESIR, GARY V., KLUGER, HARRIET M. · 2017 to 2021
$2.4M
Models to Predict Prognosis and Benefit from Adjuvant Therapy in Renal Cell CarciR01CA158167 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI KLUGER, HARRIET M. · 2011 to 2015
$1.8M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006516NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS P50 CA101942NCI NIH HHS P50 CA121974NCI NIH HHS R01 CA158167NCI NIH HHS R01 CA216846
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOutcome measures that comprehensively capture attributes of immuno-oncology agents, including prolonged treatment-free time and persistent treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), are needed to complement conventional survival end points.

methodsWe pooled data from the CheckMate 067 and 069 clinical trials of nivolumab and ipilimumab, as monotherapies or in combination, for patients with advanced melanoma. Treatment-free survival (TFS) was defined as the area between Kaplan-Meier curves for two conventional time-to-event end points, each defined from random assignment: time to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) protocol therapy cessation and time to subsequent systemic therapy initiation or death. TFS was partitioned as time with and without toxicity by a third end point, time to cessation of both ICI therapy and toxicity. Toxicity included persistent and late-onset grade 3 or higher TRAEs. The area under each Kaplan-Meier curve was estimated by the 36-month restricted mean time.

resultsAt 36 months, many of the 1,077 patients who initiated ICI therapy were surviving free of subsequent therapy initiation (47% nivolumab plus ipilimumab, 37% nivolumab, 15% ipilimumab). The restricted mean TFS was longer for nivolumab plus ipilimumab (11.1 months) compared with nivolumab (4.6 months; difference, 6.5 months; 95% CI, 5.0 to 8.0 months) or ipilimumab (8.7 months; difference, 2.4 months; 95% CI, 0.8 to 4.1 months); restricted mean TFS represented 31% (3% with and 28% without toxicity), 13% (1% and 11%), and 24% (less than 1% and 23%) of the 36-month period, respectively, in the three treatment groups. TFS without toxicity was longer for nivolumab plus ipilimumab than nivolumab (difference, 6.0 months) or ipilimumab (difference, 1.7 months).

conclusionThe analysis of TFS between ICI cessation and subsequent therapy initiation revealed longer TFS without toxicity for patients with advanced melanoma who received nivolumab plus ipilimumab compared with nivolumab or ipilimumab. Regardless of treatment, a small proportion of the TFS involved grade 3 or higher TRAEs.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsDouble-Blind MethodFollow-Up StudiesHumansIpilimumabMelanomaNivolumabPrognosisSurvival RateIpilimumabNivolumab

Identifiers

PMID31498030
PMCPMC6901280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.