ArticleIEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine2019
Elastographic Tomosynthesis From X-Ray Strain Imaging of Breast Cancer.
Article in IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Toward quantitative X-ray elastography of coronary arteries using flexural pulse waves.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Dynamic X-ray elastography using a pulsed photocathode source.Scientific reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Noncancerous breast tissue and cancerous breast tissue have different elastic properties. In particular, cancerous breast tumors are stiff when compared to the noncancerous surrounding tissue. This difference in elasticity can be used as a means for detection through the method of elastographic tomosynthesis by means of physical modulation. This paper deals with a method to visualize elasticity of soft tissues, particularly breast tissues, via x-ray tomosynthesis. X-ray tomosynthesis is now used to visualize breast tissues with better resolution than the conventional single-shot mammography. The advantage of X-ray tomosynthesis over X-ray CT is that fewer projections are needed than CT to perform the reconstruction, thus radiation exposure and cost are both reduced. Two phantoms were used for the testing of this method, a physical phantom and an in silico phantom. The standard root mean square error in the tomosynthesis for the physical phantom was 2.093 and the error in the in silico phantom was negligible. The elastographs were created through the use of displacement and strain graphing. A Gaussian Mixture Model with an expectation-maximization clustering algorithm was applied in three dimensions with an error of 16.667%. The results of this paper have been substantial when using phantom data. There are no equivalent comparisons yet in 3D x-ray elastographic tomosynthesis. Tomosynthesis with and without physical modulation in the 3D elastograph can identify feature groupings used for biopsy. The studies have potential to be applied to human test data used as a guide for biopsy to improve accuracy of diagnosis results. Further research on this topic could prove to yield new techniques for human patient diagnosis purposes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.