ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2018
Development, implementation, and evaluation of a Community Engagement Advisory Board: Strategies for maximizing success.
Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrating genomic medicine into primary care -examining perceptions of community advisory board members.Journal of community genetics · 2026Article
- A case study of enhancing bidirectional feedback between research programs and an institutional community engagement advisory board.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- Engaging stakeholders in the north-west first 1000 days project: building a strong community support ecosystem.BMC public health · 2025Article
- "… Work Really Is Being Done and It's Very Worthwhile …": Reflections from Community Advisory Board Members.Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action · 2025Article
- The Process and Cost of Developing a Community Advisory Board Focused on Opioid Overdose Deaths.Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action · 2025Article
- Designing for dissemination through community advisory board engagement in an implementation mapping process: A case study.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Characteristics of research review boards in the context of community-academic settings: A scoping review.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Review
- Communications, engagement, and dissemination strategies for the HEALthy Brain and Child Development (HBCD) Study.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2024Article
- Public Engagement with Biotechnology Inside and Outside the Classroom: Community-Focused Approaches.GEN biotechnology · 2022Article
- Engagement science: The core of dissemination, implementation, and translational research science.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2020Article
- Community advisory boards: Experiences and common practices of clinical and translational science award programs.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2019Article
- Integrating multiple community perspectives in intervention development.Health education research · 2019Article
- Addressing community health needs through community engagement research advisory boards.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2019Article
- Ready or not? Observations from a long-standing community engagement advisory board about investigator competencies for community-engaged research.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2018Article
- A Community Engagement Advisory Board as a strategy to improve research engagement and build institutional capacity for community-engaged research.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2018Article
- Preliminary Evaluation of a Citizen Scientist Educational Curriculum Aimed at Engaging Black Men in Lung Cancer Early Detection Screening.American journal of men's healthArticle
- Characterizing the Community Collaborations of a Community-Based Student-Run Clinic.Journal of primary care & community healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe purpose of this paper is to describe the formation, operation, and evaluation of a Community Engagement Advisory Board (CEAB) that serves as a resource of the University of Illinois at Chicago's (UIC) Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences (CCTS).
methodsCurrent CEAB roles and functions, operating procedures for research consultations and program evaluation strategies were described. Investigators receiving a consultation from 2009 to 2017 (n = 91, response rate 78%) were surveyed via an online survey immediately after the consultation and at 12-month follow-up.
resultsOverall, CEAB members were viewed as having sufficient information (92%) and expertise (79%) to provide consultation. Satisfaction levels with the specific consultation received and the overall consultation service were high. The majority of investigators indicated that they would come back to the CEAB for a future consultation, if needed, and would recommend a consultation to others (93% and 96%, respectively). At 12-months, 87% of respondents indicated they had implemented at least some of the recommendations received and 93% said that the consultation influenced their subsequent research.
conclusionsData from recent annual evaluations highlight the benefits of CEAB for consulting investigators. Our model can be used to inform the development of future CEAB boards.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.