Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31497272›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of organ transplantation medicine2019

Factors Considered by Nephrologists in Excluding Patients from Kidney Transplant Referral.

K Bartolomeo, A Tandon Gandhir, M Lipinski, J Romeu, N Ghahramani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of organ transplantation medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Dialysis facility referral and start of evaluation for kidney transplantation among patients treated with dialysis in the Southeastern United States.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

K BartolomeoDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.
A Tandon GandhirDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.
M LipinskiDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.
J RomeuDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.
N GhahramaniDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProvider perceptions about patient candidacy for kidney transplant (KT) are potentially significant contributors to disparities in KT.

objectiveTo examine nephrologists' perceptions about factors that are important in excluding patients from KT referral, and to analyze the association between these perceptions and nephrologists' demographic and practice characteristics.Methods: Invitations were sent to 3180 nephrologists. Among those who consented, 822 fulfilled the inclusion criteria, and 250 were randomly invited to complete a questionnaire about perceptions of factors essential in deciding not to refer patients for KT.

resultsResponses from 216 participants with complete responses were analyzed. The 3 most common reasons for excluding patients were "patient's inadequate social support" (44%), "limited understanding of the process due to patient's inadequate education" (32%), and "patient's age above 65" (26%). Nephrologists practicing in rural settings were more likely to consider inadequate support and limited education of patients as reasons not to refer for KT. In multivariate analysis, physicians with 2 or fewer transplant centers within 50 miles were more likely to report inadequate social support (OR: 3.15, 95% CI: 1.59-6.24) and age greater than 65 years (OR: 1.88, 95% CI: 1.01-3.49) as reasons to exclude patients from KT referral. Nephrologists whose practice included patients majority of whom had not completed high school were more likely to consider limited understanding due to inadequate education as an important reason to exclude patients from KT (OR: 3.31, 95% CI: 1.60-6.86).

conclusionPatient's social support, understanding, and age were the most common factors regarded by nephrologists as important in not referring patients for KT evaluation. Practice location, particularly rural setting, proximity to a transplant center, and the education level of a nephrologist's patient population were important determinants of referral for KT.

Indexed as

Health status disparitiesKidneyLife support systemsNephrologistPerceptionsReferral and consultationTransplant; Rural populationUrban population

Identifiers

PMID31497272
PMCPMC6716219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.