Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31497259›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of psychotraumatology2019

Acceptability of internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy (i-CBT) for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD): a systematic review.

Natalie Simon, Leah McGillivray, Neil P Roberts, Kali Barawi, Catrin E Lewis, Jonathan I Bisson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of psychotraumatology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Natalie SimonDivision of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5712-9460
Leah McGillivrayDivision of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK.
Neil P RobertsDivision of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6277-0102
Kali BarawiDivision of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK.
Catrin E LewisDivision of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3818-9377
Jonathan I BissonDivision of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5170-1243

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

• A review of acceptability of internet-delivered CBT (i-CBT) for PTSD.• I-CBT is a potentially acceptable psychological treatment for PTSD.• Small number of studies limits generalisability of findings.• Standardised, consistent acceptability measurement is needed.cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT)guided self help (GSH)patient dropoutspost-traumaticPost-traumatic stress disorderPTSDstress disorderstreatment adherence and compliance

Identifiers

PMID31497259
PMCPMC6719262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.