Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31496931›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2019

Learning of Artificial Sensation Through Long-Term Home Use of a Sensory-Enabled Prosthesis.

Ivana Cuberovic, Anisha Gill, Linda J Resnik, Dustin J Tyler, Emily L Graczyk

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 101 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Technology for monitoring everyday prosthesis use: a systematic review.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Integration of learned artificial sensation with vision during freely moving navigation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Clinical Applications and Future Translation of Somatosensory Neuroprostheses.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Electrical Stimulation of Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interfaces (RPNIs) Induces Referred Sensations in People With Upper Limb Loss.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Sensory Restoration for Improved Motor Control of Prostheses.Current opinion in biomedical engineering · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Examining theJournal of neural engineering · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ivana CuberovicDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Anisha GillProvidence VA Medical Center, Providence, RI, United States.
Linda J ResnikProvidence VA Medical Center, Providence, RI, United States.
Dustin J TylerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Emily L GraczykDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center · USBrown University · USCase Western Reserve University · USProvidence VA Medical Center · US

Funding

RRD VA IK6 RX003097
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Upper limb prostheses are specialized tools, and skilled operation is learned by amputees over time. Recently, neural prostheses using implanted peripheral nerve interfaces have enabled advances in artificial somatosensory feedback that can improve prosthesis outcomes. However, the effect of sensory learning on artificial somatosensation has not been studied, despite its known influence on intact somatosensation and analogous neuroprostheses. Sensory learning involves changes in the perception and interpretation of sensory feedback and may further influence functional and psychosocial outcomes. In this mixed methods case study, we examined how passive learning over 115 days of home use of a neural-connected, sensory-enabled prosthetic hand influenced perception of artificial sensory feedback in a participant with transradial amputation. We examined perceptual changes both within individual days of use and across the duration of the study. At both time scales, the reported percept locations became significantly more aligned with prosthesis sensor locations, and the phantom limb became significantly more extended toward the prosthesis position. Similarly, the participant's ratings of intensity, naturalness, and contact touch significantly increased, while his ratings of vibration and movement significantly decreased across-days for tactile channels. These sensory changes likely resulted from engagement of cortical plasticity mechanisms as the participant learned to use the artificial sensory feedback. We also assessed psychosocial and functional outcomes through surveys and interviews, and found that self-efficacy, perceived function, prosthesis embodiment, social touch, body image, and prosthesis efficiency improved significantly. These outcomes typically improved within the first month of home use, demonstrating rapid benefits of artificial sensation. Participant interviews indicated that the naturalness of the experience and engagement with the prosthesis increased throughout the study, suggesting that artificial somatosensation may decrease prosthesis abandonment. Our data showed that prosthesis embodiment was intricately related to naturalness and phantom limb perception, and that learning the artificial sensation may have modified the body schema. As another indicator of successfully learning to use artificial sensation, the participant reported the emergence of stereognosis later in the study. This study provides the first evidence that artificial somatosensation can undergo similar learning processes as intact sensation and highlights the importance of sensory restoration in prostheses.

Indexed as

amputation – rehabilitationembodiment/bodily experiencehome uselearningneural prosthesisphantom limb experienceproprioceptiontouch perception

Identifiers

PMID31496931
PMCPMC6712074
OpenAlexW2965311422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.