ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2019
Learning of Artificial Sensation Through Long-Term Home Use of a Sensory-Enabled Prosthesis.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
40 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 101 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prosthetic embodiment: systematic review on definitions, measures, and experimental paradigms.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2022Pooled it
- Technology for monitoring everyday prosthesis use: a systematic review.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2020Pooled it
- Mind the gap: the temporal discrimination threshold of tactile sensation from implanted peripheral nerve stimulation.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Trial
- First-in-human implementation of a bidirectional somatosensory neuroprosthetic system with wireless communication.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025Trial
- Testing silicone digit extensions as a way to suppress natural sensation to evaluate supplementary tactile feedback.PloS one · 2021Trial
- Integration of learned artificial sensation with vision during freely moving navigation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- A Robust Neuromuscular Interface to Restore Lost Function in People with Amputations.Research square · 2025Article
- A worldwide research overview of Artificial Proprioception in prosthetics.PLOS digital health · 2025Review
- Somatosensory restoration and neural control strategies in lower-limb prostheses.npj biomedical innovations · 2025Review
- Direct Prosthesis Force Control with Tactile Feedback May Connect with the Internal Model.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- The effects of neuron morphology and spatial distribution on the selectivity of dorsal root ganglion stimulation.Journal of neural engineering · 2024Article
- Clinical Applications and Future Translation of Somatosensory Neuroprostheses.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024Review
- Artificial embodiment displaces cortical neuromagnetic somatosensory responses.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Electrical Stimulation of Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interfaces (RPNIs) Induces Referred Sensations in People With Upper Limb Loss.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2024Article
- A hybrid sensory feedback system for thermal nociceptive warning and protection in prosthetic hand.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
- Restoration of natural somatic sensations to the amputees: finding the right combination of neurostimulation methods.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
- Sensory Restoration for Improved Motor Control of Prostheses.Current opinion in biomedical engineering · 2023Article
- Object stiffness recognition and vibratory feedback withoutFrontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Closed-loop stimulation of lateral cervical spinal cord in upper-limb amputees to enable sensory discrimination: a case study.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Examining theJournal of neural engineering · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Upper limb prostheses are specialized tools, and skilled operation is learned by amputees over time. Recently, neural prostheses using implanted peripheral nerve interfaces have enabled advances in artificial somatosensory feedback that can improve prosthesis outcomes. However, the effect of sensory learning on artificial somatosensation has not been studied, despite its known influence on intact somatosensation and analogous neuroprostheses. Sensory learning involves changes in the perception and interpretation of sensory feedback and may further influence functional and psychosocial outcomes. In this mixed methods case study, we examined how passive learning over 115 days of home use of a neural-connected, sensory-enabled prosthetic hand influenced perception of artificial sensory feedback in a participant with transradial amputation. We examined perceptual changes both within individual days of use and across the duration of the study. At both time scales, the reported percept locations became significantly more aligned with prosthesis sensor locations, and the phantom limb became significantly more extended toward the prosthesis position. Similarly, the participant's ratings of intensity, naturalness, and contact touch significantly increased, while his ratings of vibration and movement significantly decreased across-days for tactile channels. These sensory changes likely resulted from engagement of cortical plasticity mechanisms as the participant learned to use the artificial sensory feedback. We also assessed psychosocial and functional outcomes through surveys and interviews, and found that self-efficacy, perceived function, prosthesis embodiment, social touch, body image, and prosthesis efficiency improved significantly. These outcomes typically improved within the first month of home use, demonstrating rapid benefits of artificial sensation. Participant interviews indicated that the naturalness of the experience and engagement with the prosthesis increased throughout the study, suggesting that artificial somatosensation may decrease prosthesis abandonment. Our data showed that prosthesis embodiment was intricately related to naturalness and phantom limb perception, and that learning the artificial sensation may have modified the body schema. As another indicator of successfully learning to use artificial sensation, the participant reported the emergence of stereognosis later in the study. This study provides the first evidence that artificial somatosensation can undergo similar learning processes as intact sensation and highlights the importance of sensory restoration in prostheses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.