ArticleClinical and experimental gastroenterology2019
Evaluating the clinical and economic consequences of using video capsule endoscopy to monitor Crohn's disease.
Article in Clinical and experimental gastroenterology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Contemporary Landscape of Medical Technology in Gastroenterology Between 2013 and 2023.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Pan-Enteric Capsule Endoscopy: Current Applications and Future Perspectives.GE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology · 2024Review
- Capsule endoscopy and panendoscopy: A journey to the future of gastrointestinal endoscopy.World journal of gastroenterology · 2024Article
- Validation of a Model Estimating the Budget Impact of Video Capsule Endoscopy for Surveillance of Crohn's Disease in an Italian Center.Journal of health economics and outcomes research · 2024Article
- Review
- Review: Colon Capsule Endoscopy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Capsule Endoscopy in Crohn's Disease-From a Relative Contraindication to Habitual Monitoring Tool.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Scoring Systems for Clinical Colon Capsule Endoscopy-All You Need to Know.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Economic analysis of the adoption of capsule endoscopy within the British NHS.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo assess the cost and patient impact of using small bowel and colon video capsule endoscopy (SBC) for scheduled monitoring of Crohn's disease (CD).
methodsAn individual-patient, decision-analytic model of the CD care pathway was developed given current practice and expert input. A literature review informed clinical endpoints with data from peer-reviewed literature. Four thousand simulated CD patients were extrapolated from summary patient data from the Project Sonar Database. Two monitoring scenarios were assessed in this population. The first scenario represented common monitoring practice (CMP) for CD (ileocolonoscopy plus imaging), while in the second scenario patients were converted to disease monitoring using SBC. The cost-effectiveness of using SBC was assessed over 20 years. The cost of switching 50% of patients to SBC was assessed over 5 years for a health-plan including 12,000 patients with CD. Uncertainty of results was assessed using probabilistic sensitivity analysis.
resultsAll patient groups showed increased quality of life with SBC versus CMP, with the highest gain in active symptomatic patients. Over 20 years, SBC reduced costs ($313,367 versus $320,015), increased life expectancy (18.15 versus 17.9 years) and increased quality of life (8.7 versus 8.0 QALY), making it a cost-effective option. SBC was cost-effective in 71% of individuals and 78% of populations including 50 patients. A payer implementing SBC in 50% of patients over 5 years could expect a decreased cost of monitoring (-$469 mean per patient) and surgery (-$698), but increased costs for active treatments (+$717). The discounted mean annual cost of care using CMP was $22,681 per patient over 5 years. The annual savings were $1135 per SBC-patient. The total savings for the payer over 5 years were $36.5 million.
conclusionSBC is likely to be a cost-effective and cost-saving strategy for monitoring CD in the US.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.