Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31496677›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2019

Mepolizumab in the treatment of eosinophilic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Takudzwa Mkorombindo, Mark T Dransfield

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Taking a Breather: Advances in Interleukin 5 Inhibition for Asthma Relief.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Mepolizumab and COPD in Real Life.Open respiratory archives
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Takudzwa MkorombindoLung Health Center, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Mark T DransfieldLung Health Center, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
University of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

UAB Mentoring Program in COPD Patient Oriented ResearchK24HL140108 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI DRANSFIELD, MARK T · 2018 to 2022
$439k
NHLBI NIH HHS K24 HL140108
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite maximal medical therapy, a subset of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease continue to suffer acute exacerbations. It is also clear that a subset of this population has elevated blood eosinophils. In addition to clearly responding better to inhaled corticosteroids, it is also possible that this subgroup may benefit from biologic treatments targeting eosinophilic inflammation. Mepolizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody against interleukin-5 (IL-5), may have a therapeutic effect in a subgroup of patients with COPD and eosinophilic airway inflammation. In this review, we discuss the biologic rationale for mepolizumab targeting IL-5 in eosinophilic COPD as well as the results of recently published clinical trials.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedEosinophiliaHumansPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, Humanizedmepolizumabacute exacerbations of COPDCOPDeosinophilsmepolizumab

Identifiers

PMID31496677
PMCPMC6689550
OpenAlexW2964497382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.