Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31496640›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2019

In vitro demodicidal activity of commercial lid hygiene products.

Alan G Kabat

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact, top 77% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. The Effect of Terpinen-4-ol on Human Corneal Epithelium.Translational vision science & technology · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Treatment of ocularAmerican journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Hypochlorous acid solution (AvenovaClinical optometry · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alan G KabatPennsylvania College of Optometry, Salus University, Elkins Park, PA 19027, USA.
Southern College of Optometry · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose

methodsLive Demodex mites were obtained from volunteers. Samples were immersed in 1-2 drops of test solution: 0.01% HOCl, 4% T4O, or 100% MO. Samples were observed under the microscope every 10 mins for up to 90 mins. Kill time was defined as the elapsed time between the addition of test solution and all cessation of movement of the body, legs, mouth and pedipalps for a minimum of 60 seconds.

resultsT4O demonstrated a mean kill time of 40±0.0 mins. HOCl had a mean kill time of 87.86±4.23 mins, with 79% of samples surviving the full 90 mins. In the MO group, all samples survived through the 90 min mark. Kill time was statistically significant in favor of T4O as compared to HOCl (

conclusion4% T4O effectively killed all adult mite samples within 40 mins of exposure. In contrast, the demodicidal activity of 0.01% HOCl was minimal, and comparatively similar to 100% MO.

Indexed as

blepharitisDemodexhypochlorous acidlid hygienetea tree oilterpinen-4-ol

Identifiers

PMID31496640
PMCPMC6689564
OpenAlexW2928972793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.