Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31496616›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2019

Ileal-anal pouches: A review of its history, indications, and complications.

Kheng-Seong Ng, Simon Joseph Gonsalves, Peter Michael Sagar

Abstract readHistorical ArticleReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 120 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials on the Prevention and Treatment of Pouchitis after Ileoanal Pouch Anastomosis.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2023
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kheng-Seong NgJohn Goligher Colorectal Unit, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, United Kingdom.
Simon Joseph GonsalvesDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Huddersfield Royal Infirmary, Calderdale and Huddersfield NHS Foundation Trust, Huddersfield HD3 3EA, United Kingdom.
Peter Michael SagarJohn Goligher Colorectal Unit, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, United Kingdom, petersagar@aol.com.
St James's University Hospital · GBHuddersfield Royal Infirmary · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) has revolutionised the surgical management of ulcerative colitis (UC) and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Despite refinement in surgical technique(s) and patient selection, IPAA can be associated with significant morbidity. As the IPAA celebrated its 40

Indexed as

Adenomatous Polyposis ColiAnastomotic LeakColitis, UlcerativeHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansPatient SelectionPouchitisProctocolectomy, RestorativeQuality of LifeSepsisSeverity of Illness IndexCrohn’s diseaseFamilial adenomatous polyposisIleal pouchRestorative proctocolectomyUlcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID31496616
PMCPMC6710180
OpenAlexW2969273279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.