Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31496462›Full record

ArticleBJPsych open2019

Accuracy of self-referral in health anxiety: comparison of patients self-referring to internet-delivered treatment versus patients clinician-referred to face-to-face treatment.

Ditte Hoffmann, Charlotte Ulrikka Rask, Erik Hedman-Lagerlöf, Trine Eilenberg, Lisbeth Frostholm

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJPsych open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01158430 nacompletednot on this map

Treatment of Patients With Health Anxiety. A Randomized Controlled Trial of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) Group Treatment Compared to a Waiting List

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of AarhusRan2010 to 2013Enrolled126ConditionsHypochondriasis, Somatization DisorderArmsACT group therapy
NCT02735434 nacompletednot on this map

Internet-delivered Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Patients With Health Anxiety: a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of AarhusRan2016 to 2018Enrolled101ConditionsHypochondriasisArmsInternet-based ACT, Internet-based discussion forum
NCT04830605 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Feasibility Test of the Treatment Program iACT-by Proxy - a Single Case Experimental Design

TypeinterventionalSponsorAarhus University HospitalRan2022 to 2023Enrolled4ConditionsAnxiety State, Anxiety DisordersArmsInternet-based treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ditte HoffmannPostdoctoral Researcher, The Research Clinic for Functional Disorders and Psychosomatics, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8549-4115
Charlotte Ulrikka RaskProfessor, Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Centre, Risskov, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.
Erik Hedman-LagerlöfAssociate Professor, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Sweden.
Trine EilenbergClinical Psychologist, Department of Occupational Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.
Lisbeth FrostholmAssociate Professor, The Research Clinic for Functional Disorders and Psychosomatics, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSevere health anxiety is a chronic and costly disorder if untreated. Patient self-referral may lower barriers to treatment and decrease diagnostic delay.

aimsThis study evaluated the accuracy of self-referral for severe health anxiety and compared characteristics of patients self-referred to internet-delivered treatment with patients referred by a clinician to face-to-face treatment.

methodTwo trials in the same clinic employed different referral methods for health anxiety, namely self-referral and clinician-referral (trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01158430 and NCT02735434). The trials were conducted at different time points but with largely comparable eligibility criteria. The accuracy of the recruitment methods was compared by looking at the number of eligible patients in the two trials. Patients completed a baseline questionnaire and subsequently underwent a diagnostic interview by experienced clinicians. Mean differences in self-report and clinical data explored between-group demographic and clinical characteristics.

resultsIn total, 101/151 (67%) self-referred patients were eligible compared with 126/254 (50%) clinician-referred patients (P = 0.001). Self-referred patients were 3.4 years older (P = 0.008) and had a somewhat higher educational level (P = 0.030). Patients who self-referred reported significantly higher levels of health anxiety, emotional distress and somatic symptoms compared with clinician-referred patients. Yet, they had less clinician-assessed comorbid anxiety disorders (P<0.001) and better physical health-related quality of life (P<0.001) suggesting a more distinct symptom profile.

conclusionsSelf-referral was found to be an accurate method to recruit highly relevant patients with treatment-demanding health anxiety. Thus, both self-referral and clinician-referral seem feasible and valid referral methods, but they may recruit patients with slightly different characteristics. DECLARATION OF INTEREST: None.

Indexed as

barriers to treatmentHealth anxietyhypochondriasisinternet interventionself-referral

Identifiers

PMID31496462
PMCPMC6737511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.