ArticleACS applied materials & interfaces2019
Surface Modification of Glass/PDMS Microfluidic Valve Assemblies Enhances Valve Electrical Resistance.
Article in ACS applied materials & interfaces, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hydromechanical Modulation of Enzymatic Kinetics Using Microfluidically Configurable Nanoconfinement Arrays.ACS central science · 2024Article
- Flow Regulation Performance Analysis of Microfluidic Passive Valve for High Throughput Liquid Delivery.Micromachines · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Microfluidic instrumentation offers unique advantages in biotechnology applications including reduced sample and reagent consumption, rapid mixing and reaction times, and a high degree of process automation. As dimensions decrease, the ratio of surface area to volume within a fluidic architecture increases, which gives rise to some of the unique advantages inherent to microfluidics. Thus, manipulation of surface characteristics presents a promising approach to tailor the performance of microfluidic systems. Microfluidic valves are essential components in a number of small volume applications and for automated microfluidic platforms, but rigorous evaluation of the sealing quality of these valves is often overlooked. In this work, the glass valve seat of hybrid glass/PDMS microfluidic valves was surface modified with hydrophobic silanes, octyldimethylchlorosilane (ODCS) or (tridecafluoro-1,1,2,2-tetrahydrooctyl)dimethylchlorosilane (PFDCS), to investigate the effect of surface energy on electrical resistance of valves. Valves with ODCS- or PFDCS-modified valve seats both exhibited >70-fold increases in electrical resistance (>500 GΩ) when compared to the same valve design with unmodified glass valve seats (7 ± 3 GΩ), indicative of higher sealing capacity. The opening times for valves with ODCS- or PFDCS-modified valve seats was ca. 5× shorter compared to unmodified valve seats, whereas the closing time was up to 8× longer for modified valve seats, although the total closing time was ≤1.5 s, compatible with numerous microfluidic valving applications. Surface modified valve assemblies offered sufficient electrical resistance to isolate sub-pA current signals resulting from electrophysiology measurement of α-hemolysin conductance in a suspended lipid bilayer. This approach is well-suited for the design of novel microfluidic architectures that integrate fluidic manipulations with electrophysiological or electrochemical measurements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.