Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31494864›Full record

SynthesisSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2019

Effects of Physical Exercise Training in the Workplace on Physical Fitness: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Olaf Prieske, Tina Dalager, Michael Herz, Tibor Hortobagyi, Gisela Sjøgaard, Karen Søgaard, Urs Granacher

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. [Research advances on the effect of resistance training on the rehabilitation of burned children].Zhonghua shao shang za zhi = Zhonghua shaoshang zazhi = Chinese journal of burns · 2021
    Review
  19. Efficacy and costs of a workplace wellness programme.Occupational medicine (Oxford, England) · 2020
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Olaf PrieskeUniversity of Applied Sciences for Sports and Management Potsdam, Am Luftschiffhafen 1, 14471, Potsdam, Germany. prieske@fhsmp.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4475-4413
Tina DalagerDepartment of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6632-7001
Michael HerzDivision of Training and Movement Sciences, Research Focus Cognitive Sciences, University of Potsdam, Am Neuen Palais 10, 14469, Potsdam, Germany.
Tibor HortobagyiCenter for Human Movement Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5732-7942
Gisela SjøgaardDepartment of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2961-7800
Karen SøgaardDepartment of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3968-6364
Urs GranacherDivision of Training and Movement Sciences, Research Focus Cognitive Sciences, University of Potsdam, Am Neuen Palais 10, 14469, Potsdam, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7095-813X
University of Potsdam · DEUniversity of Southern Denmark · DKUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is evidence that physical exercise training (PET) conducted at the workplace is effective in improving physical fitness and thus health. However, there is no current systematic review available that provides high-level evidence regarding the effects of PET on physical fitness in the workforce.

objectivesTo quantify sex-, age-, and occupation type-specific effects of PET on physical fitness and to characterize dose-response relationships of PET modalities that could maximize gains in physical fitness in the working population. DATA SOURCES: A computerized systematic literature search was conducted in the databases PubMed and Cochrane Library (2000-2019) to identify articles related to PET in workers. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Only randomized controlled trials with a passive control group were included if they investigated the effects of PET programs in workers and tested at least one fitness measure. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS

methodsWeighted mean standardised mean differences (SMD

resultsOverall, 3423 workers aged 30-56 years participated in 17 studies (19 articles) that were eligible for inclusion. Methodological quality of the included studies was moderate with a median PEDro score of 6. Our analyses revealed significant, small-sized effects of PET on cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF), muscular endurance, and muscle power (0.29 ≤ SMD

conclusionsPET effects on physical fitness in healthy workers are moderated by age (CRF) and occupation type (muscular endurance). Further, independently computed subgroup analyses indicated that the training period of the PET programs may play an important role in improving CRF in workers.

Indexed as

ExercisePhysical FitnessWorkplaceAdultAge FactorsCardiorespiratory FitnessFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMuscle StrengthOccupationsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSex Factors

Identifiers

PMID31494864
OpenAlexW2971486638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.