ArticleCurrent microbiology2019
Glycine Betaine Effect on Dormancy in Deinococcus sp. UDEC-P1 and Psychrobacter sp. UDEC-A5 Exposed to Hyperosmotic Stress.
Article in Current microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Bacteria under stress increase the proportion of dormant cells to ensure their survival. Cold and osmotic stress are similar, because in both the availability of water is reduced. Glycine betaine (GB) is one of the most common osmoprotectants in bacteria and possesses cryoprotectant properties. Our aim was to determine whether GB modifies the proportion of dormant Deinococcus sp. UDEC-P1 and Psychrobacter sp. UDEC-A5 cells exposed to osmotic stress. Both bacterial strains were incubated in the presence of up to 1 M NaCl with or without GB. Active and dormant cells were evaluated by both spectrophotometric and flow cytometry analysis. Without GB, Deinococcus sp. UDEC-P1 grew in the presence of 0.05 M NaCl, but with 5 mM GB grew at 0.1 M NaCl. Psychrobacter sp. UDEC-A5 grew in the presence of up to 0.25 M NaCl, but with 5 mM GB grew at 0.5 M NaCl. Under osmotic stress, the proportion of dormant cells of Deinococcus sp. UDEC-P1 and Psychrobacter sp. UDEC-A5 increased significantly (about eightfold and fivefold, respectively). The addition of GB (5 mM) exerted a different effect on the two strains, since it avoided the entrance into the dormancy of Psychrobacter sp. UDEC-A5 cells, but not of Deinococcus sp. UDEC-P1 cells. Our results suggest that the effect of GB on bacterial metabolism is strain dependent. For bacteria in which GB avoids dormancy, such as Psychrobacter sp. UDEC-A5, it could be a "double-edged sword" by reducing the "seed bank" available to recover the active population when favorable conditions return.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.