Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31494728›Full record

ArticleSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2019

Anatomical landmarks for acetabular abduction in adult hips: the teardrop vs. the inferior acetabular rim.

Jin Park, Gab Lae Kim, Kyu Hyun Yang

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Evaluation of Changes in Hip Morphology in a Rabbit Model of Patellar Dislocation via Computed Tomography Imaging.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jin ParkDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University, 150 Sung-an-ro, Kangdonggu, Seoul, 05355, South Korea. parkjinos@gmail.com.
Gab Lae KimDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University, 150 Sung-an-ro, Kangdonggu, Seoul, 05355, South Korea.
Kyu Hyun YangDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea.
Hallym University · KRKangdong Sacred Heart Hospital · KRYonsei University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study is to compare the acetabular teardrop (the structure located inferomedially in the acetabulum, just superior to the obturator foramen. The medial lip is the interior, and the lateral lip is the exterior of the acetabular wall) with the inferior acetabular rim as anatomical landmarks to measure the acetabular abduction angle (AAD) using coronal CT images from different levels.

methodsOur retrospective study included 120 pelvic CT scans from patients with non-orthopedic pathologies or stress fractures of the proximal femur. The patients included 60 females with a mean age of 48 years (range 40-66) and 60 males with a mean age of 46 years (range 38-65). Each AAD was measured using coronal plane CT slices from five levels: AAD (+ 10) (10 mm anterior to the femoral head center), AAD (+ 5) (5 mm anterior to the femoral head center), AAD (0) (through the femoral head center), AAD (- 5) (5 mm posterior to the femoral head center), and AAD (- 10) (10 mm posterior to the femoral head center). The measurements were then divided into two groups: teardrop-based AADs [AAD (+ 10), AAD (+ 5), and AAD (0)] and rim-based AADs [AAD (- 5) and AAD (- 10)].

resultsThere were no mean significant differences in AAD within the groups, whereas the difference between the groups was significant. The mean teardrop-based AAD was quite significantly different from the mean rim-based AAD due to the use of different anatomical landmarks. Teardrop-based AADs are lower than rim-based AADs, leading to measurement differences of more than 10°.

conclusionsAAD measurements considering the inferior acetabular rim can be more accurate than those considering the acetabular teardrop because the inferior rim represents the nearly hemispheric acetabulum better than does the teardrop. It is recommended to differentiate between the teardrop and the inferior acetabular rim when measuring AAD to avoid confusion regarding acetabular abduction.

Indexed as

Anatomic LandmarksRange of Motion, ArticularAcetabulumAdultAgedFemaleHip JointHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedAcetabular abductionInferior acetabular rimTeardrop

Identifiers

PMID31494728
OpenAlexW2971705263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.