Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31494716›Full record

ReviewLangenbeck's archives of surgery2019

Accreditation of endocrine surgery units.

Thomas J Musholt, Robert Bränström, Reto Martin Kaderli, Nuria Muñoz Pérez, Marco Raffaelli, Michael J Stechman, ESES

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Thomas J MusholtSection of Endocrine Surgery, Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Medicine of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany. musholt@uni-mainz.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4498-7439
Robert BränströmEndocrine and Sarcoma Surgery Unit, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Reto Martin KaderliDepartment of Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Germany.
Nuria Muñoz PérezCirugía General, Sección de Cirugía Endocrina, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain.
Marco RaffaelliIstituto di Semeiotica Chirurgica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1259-2491
Michael J StechmanDepartment of Endocrine Surgery, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK.
ESES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background/purposeA key measure to maintain and improve the quality of healthcare is the formal accreditation of provider units. The European Society of Endocrine Surgeons (ESES) therefore proposes a system of accreditation for endocrine surgical centers in Europe to supplement existing measures that promote high standards in the practice in endocrine surgery.

methodsA working group analyzed the current healthcare situation in the field of endocrine surgery in Europe. Two surveys were distributed to ESES members to acquire information about the structure, staffing, caseload, specifications, and technology available to endocrine surgery units. Further data were sought on tracer diagnoses for quality standards, training provision, and research activity. Existing accreditation models related to endocrine surgery were included in the analysis.

resultsThe analysis of existing accreditation models, available evidence, and survey results suggests that a majority of ESES members aspire to a two-level model (termed competence and reference centers), sub-divided into those providing neck endocrine surgery and those providing endocrine surgery. Criteria for minimum caseload, number and certification of staff, unit structure, on-site collaborating disciplines, research activities, and training capacity for competence center accreditation are proposed. Lastly, quality indicators for distinct tracer diagnoses are defined.

conclusionsDiffering healthcare structures, existing accreditation models, training models, and varied case volumes across Europe are barriers to the conception and implementation of a pan-European accreditation model. However, there is consensus on accepted standards required for accrediting an ESES competence center. These will serve as a basis for first-stage accreditation of endocrine surgery units.

Indexed as

AccreditationChildEndocrine Surgical ProceduresGermanyHospital UnitsHumansQuality Assurance, Health CareAccreditationEndocrine surgeryQuality control

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.