Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31494672›Full record

ArticleGigaScience2019

rCASC: reproducible classification analysis of single-cell sequencing data.

Luca Alessandrì, Francesca Cordero, Marco Beccuti, Maddalena Arigoni, Martina Olivero, Greta Romano, Sergio Rabellino, Nicola Licheri, Gennaro De Libero, Luigia Pace and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GigaScience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Luca AlessandrìDepartment of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, University of Torino, Via Nizza 52, 10125 Torino, Italy.
Francesca CorderoDepartment of Computer Science, University of Torino, Corso Svizzera 185, 10149 Torino, Italy.
Marco BeccutiDepartment of Computer Science, University of Torino, Corso Svizzera 185, 10149 Torino, Italy.
Maddalena ArigoniDepartment of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, University of Torino, Via Nizza 52, 10125 Torino, Italy.
Martina OliveroDepartment of Oncology, University of Torino, SP142, 95, 10060 Candiolo (TO), Italy.
Greta RomanoDepartment of Computer Science, University of Torino, Corso Svizzera 185, 10149 Torino, Italy.
Sergio RabellinoDepartment of Computer Science, University of Torino, Corso Svizzera 185, 10149 Torino, Italy.
Nicola LicheriDepartment of Computer Science, University of Torino, Corso Svizzera 185, 10149 Torino, Italy.
Gennaro De LiberoDepartment Biomedizin, University of Basel, Hebelstrasse 20, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.
Luigia PaceItalian Istitute for Genomic Medicine, IIGM, c/o IRCCS 10060 Candiolo (TO), Italy.
Raffaele A CalogeroDepartment of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, University of Torino, Via Nizza 52, 10125 Torino, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSingle-cell RNA sequencing is essential for investigating cellular heterogeneity and highlighting cell subpopulation-specific signatures. Single-cell sequencing applications have spread from conventional RNA sequencing to epigenomics, e.g., ATAC-seq. Many related algorithms and tools have been developed, but few computational workflows provide analysis flexibility while also achieving functional (i.e., information about the data and the tools used are saved as metadata) and computational reproducibility (i.e., a real image of the computational environment used to generate the data is stored) through a user-friendly environment.

findingsrCASC is a modular workflow providing an integrated analysis environment (from count generation to cell subpopulation identification) exploiting Docker containerization to achieve both functional and computational reproducibility in data analysis. Hence, rCASC provides preprocessing tools to remove low-quality cells and/or specific bias, e.g., cell cycle. Subpopulation discovery can instead be achieved using different clustering techniques based on different distance metrics. Cluster quality is then estimated through the new metric "cell stability score" (CSS), which describes the stability of a cell in a cluster as a consequence of a perturbation induced by removing a random set of cells from the cell population. CSS provides better cluster robustness information than the silhouette metric. Moreover, rCASC's tools can identify cluster-specific gene signatures.

conclusionsrCASC is a modular workflow with new features that could help researchers define cell subpopulations and detect subpopulation-specific markers. It uses Docker for ease of installation and to achieve a computation-reproducible analysis. A Java GUI is provided to welcome users without computational skills in R.

Indexed as

Sequence Analysis, RNASingle-Cell AnalysisWorkflowCluster AnalysisHumansLeukocytes, MononuclearSoftwareclusteringcluster-specific gene signaturecluster stability metricsGUIsingle-cell data preprocessingworkflow

Identifiers

PMID31494672
PMCPMC6732171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.