Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31494632›Full record

ReviewJournal of integrative bioinformatics2019

A Survey of Gene Prioritization Tools for Mendelian and Complex Human Diseases.

Olga Zolotareva, Maren Kleine

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of integrative bioinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Resources and tools for rare disease variant interpretation.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Adjustment ofFrontiers in genetics · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Olga ZolotarevaBielefeld University, Faculty of Technology and Center for Biotechnology, International Research Training Group "Computational Methods for the Analysis of the Diversity and Dynamics of Genomes" and Genome Informatics, Universitätsstraße 25, Bielefeld, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9424-8052
Maren KleineBielefeld University, Faculty of Technology, Bioinformatics/Medical Informatics Department, Universitätsstraße 25, Bielefeld, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modern high-throughput experiments provide us with numerous potential associations between genes and diseases. Experimental validation of all the discovered associations, let alone all the possible interactions between them, is time-consuming and expensive. To facilitate the discovery of causative genes, various approaches for prioritization of genes according to their relevance for a given disease have been developed. In this article, we explain the gene prioritization problem and provide an overview of computational tools for gene prioritization. Among about a hundred of published gene prioritization tools, we select and briefly describe 14 most up-to-date and user-friendly. Also, we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of existing tools, challenges of their validation, and the directions for future research.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyGene Regulatory NetworksGenetic Diseases, InbornGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansData integrationGene prioritizationHuman diseases

Identifiers

PMID31494632
PMCPMC7074139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.