Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31494576›Full record

ReviewEmergency medicine journal : EMJ2019

Taxonomy of the form and function of primary care services in or alongside emergency departments: concepts paper.

Alison Cooper, Michelle Edwards, Janet Brandling, Andrew Carson-Stevens, Matthew Cooke, Freya Davies, Thomas Hughes, Katherine Morton, Aloysius Siriwardena, Sarah Voss and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Emergency medicine journal : EMJ, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Implementing public involvement throughout the research process-Experience and learning from the GPs in EDs study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Perspectives of GPs working in or alongside emergency departments in England: qualitative findings from the GPs and Emergency Departments Study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2022
    Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Identifying safe care processes when GPs work in or alongside emergency departments: a realist evaluation.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Alison CooperDivision of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8660-6721
Michelle EdwardsDivision of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7432-2828
Janet BrandlingFaculty of Health and Applied Sciences, The University of the West of England, Bristol, UK.
Andrew Carson-StevensDivision of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7580-7699
Matthew CookeWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, West Midlands, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1038-3821
Freya DaviesDivision of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6956-1100
Thomas HughesEmergency Department, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5490-1267
Katherine MortonFaculty of Health and Applied Sciences, The University of the West of England, Bristol, UK.
Aloysius SiriwardenaLincoln School of Health and Social Care, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, Lincolnshire, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2484-8201
Sarah VossFaculty of Health and Applied Sciences, The University of the West of England, Bristol, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5044-5145
Jonathan BengerFaculty of Health and Applied Sciences, The University of the West of England, Bristol, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6131-0916
Adrian EdwardsDivision of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6228-4446

Funding

Department of Health HS&DR/15/145/04Department of Health HS&DR/15/145/06
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primary care services in or alongside emergency departments look and function differently and are described using inconsistent terminology. Research to determine effectiveness of these models is hampered by outdated classification systems, limiting the opportunity for data synthesis to draw conclusions and inform decision-making and policy. We used findings from a literature review, a national survey of Type 1 emergency departments in England and Wales, staff interviews, other routine data sources and discussions from two stakeholder events to inform the taxonomy. We categorised the forms inside or outside the emergency department: inside primary care services may be integrated with emergency department patient flow or may run parallel to that activity; outside services may be offered on site or off site. We then describe a conceptual spectrum of integration: identifying constructs that influence how the services function-from being closer to an emergency medicine service or to usual primary care. This taxonomy provides a basis for future evaluation of service models that will comprise the evidence base to inform policy-making in this domain. Commissioners and service providers can consider these constructs in characterising and designing services depending on local circumstances and context.

Indexed as

Emergency Medical ServicesEmergency Service, HospitalEnglandModels, OrganizationalPrimary Health CareWalesemergency care systems, primary careemergency departmentsprimary care

Identifiers

PMID31494576
PMCPMC6837280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.