Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31494440›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2019

Impact of a community-based naloxone distribution program on opioid overdose death rates.

Rebecca B Naumann, Christine Piette Durrance, Shabbar I Ranapurwala, Anna E Austin, Scott Proescholdbell, Robert Childs, Stephen W Marshall, Susan Kansagra, Meghan E Shanahan

Open access · greenAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 104 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rebecca B NaumannDepartment of Epidemiology and Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, CVS Plaza, Suite 500, 137 East Franklin St., CB #7505, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA. Electronic address: RNaumann@unc.edu.
Christine Piette DurranceDepartment of Public Policy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 203 Abernethy Hall, CB #3435, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA. Electronic address: christine.durrance@unc.edu.
Shabbar I RanapurwalaDepartment of Epidemiology and Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, CVS Plaza, Suite 500, 137 East Franklin St., CB #7505, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA. Electronic address: sirana@email.unc.edu.
Anna E AustinDepartment of Maternal and Child Health and Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, CVS Plaza, Suite 500, 137 East Franklin St., CB #7505, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA. Electronic address: annaaust@live.unc.edu.
Scott ProescholdbellInjury and Violence Prevention Branch, Division of Public Health, NC Department of Health and Human Services, 5505 Six Forks Road, Raleigh, NC 27609 USA. Electronic address: scott.proescholdbell@dhhs.nc.gov.
Robert ChildsFormerly (and at time of this work): Consultant to North Carolina Harm Reduction Coalition, Currently: JBS International, Inc., 5515 Security Lane, Suite 800, North Bethesda, MD 20852 USA. Electronic address: robert.bb.childs@gmail.com.
Stephen W MarshallDepartment of Epidemiology and Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, CVS Plaza, Suite 500, 137 East Franklin St., CB #7505, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA. Electronic address: SMarshall@unc.edu.
Susan KansagraChronic Disease and Injury Section, Division of Public Health, NC Department of Health and Human Services, 5505 Six Forks Road, Raleigh, NC 27609 USA. Electronic address: Susan.Kansagra@dhhs.nc.gov.
Meghan E ShanahanDepartment of Maternal and Child Health and Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, CVS Plaza, Suite 500, 137 East Franklin St., CB #7505, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA. Electronic address: shanahan@unc.edu.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USNC Department of Health and Human Services · USJBS International (United States) · US

Funding

NCIPC CDC HHS R49 CE001495NCIPC CDC HHS U17 CE002728
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn August 2013, a naloxone distribution program was implemented in North Carolina (NC). This study evaluated that program by quantifying the association between the program and county-level opioid overdose death (OOD) rates and conducting a cost-benefit analysis.

methodsOne-group pre-post design. Data included annual county-level counts of naloxone kits distributed from 2013 to 2016 and mortality data from 2000-2016. We used generalized estimating equations to estimate the association between cumulative rates of naloxone kits distributed and annual OOD rates. Costs included naloxone kit purchases and distribution costs; benefits were quantified as OODs avoided and monetized using a conservative value of a life.

resultsThe rate of OOD in counties with 1-100 cumulative naloxone kits distributed per 100,000 population was 0.90 times (95% CI: 0.78, 1.04) that of counties that had not received kits. In counties that received >100 cumulative kits per 100,000 population, the OOD rate was 0.88 times (95% CI: 0.76, 1.02) that of counties that had not received kits. By December 2016, an estimated 352 NC deaths were avoided by naloxone distribution (95% CI: 189, 580). On average, for every dollar spent on the program, there was $2742 of benefit due to OODs avoided (95% CI: $1,237, $4882).

conclusionsOur estimates suggest that community-based naloxone distribution is associated with lower OOD rates. The program generated substantial societal benefits due to averted OODs. States and communities should continue to support efforts to increase naloxone access, which may include reducing legal, financial, and normative barriers.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultCost-Benefit AnalysisDelivery of Health CareDrug OverdoseFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsNorth CarolinaOpioid-Related DisordersProgram EvaluationYoung AdultNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsHarm reductionNaloxoneNarcoticOpioidOverdose

Identifiers

PMID31494440
PMCPMC8107918
OpenAlexW2970055270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.