Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31494289›Full record

ArticlePractical radiation oncology

Incorporation of Biologic Response Variance Modeling Into the Clinic: Limiting Risk of Brachial Plexopathy and Other Late Effects of Breast Cancer Proton Beam Therapy.

Robert W Mutter, Krishan R Jethwa, Hok Seum Wan Chan Tseung, Stephanie M Wick, Mohamed M H Kahila, Jason K Viehman, Dean A Shumway, Kimberly S Corbin, Sean S Park, Nicholas B Remmes and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Practical radiation oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Robert W MutterDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. Electronic address: mutter.robert@mayo.edu.
Krishan R JethwaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Hok Seum Wan Chan TseungDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Stephanie M WickDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Mohamed M H KahilaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Jason K ViehmanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Dean A ShumwayDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Kimberly S CorbinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Sean S ParkDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Nicholas B RemmesDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Thomas J WhitakerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Chris J BeltranDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

Funding

Mayo Clinic Interdisciplinary Women's Health Research ProgramK12HD065987 · NICHD · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI KANTARCI, KEJAL · 2010 to 2023
$6.7M
NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD065987
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe relative biologic effectiveness (RBE) rises with increasing linear energy transfer toward the end of proton tracks. Presently, there is no consensus on how RBE heterogeneity should be accounted for in breast cancer proton therapy treatment planning. Our purpose was to determine the dosimetric consequences of incorporating a brachial plexus (BP) biologic dose constraint and to describe other clinical implications of biologic planning. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We instituted a biologic dose constraint for the BP in the context of MC1631, a randomized trial of conventional versus hypofractionated postmastectomy intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT). IMPT plans of 13 patients treated before the implementation of the biologic dose constraint (cohort A) were compared with IMPT plans of 38 patients treated on MC1631 after its implementation (cohort B) using (1) a commercially available Eclipse treatment planning system (RBE = 1.1); (2) an in-house graphic processor unit-based Monte Carlo physical dose simulation (RBE = 1.1); and (3) an in-house Monte Carlo biologic dose (MCBD) simulation that assumes a linear relationship between RBE and dose-averaged linear energy transfer (product of RBE and physical dose = biologic dose).

resultsBefore implementation of a BP biologic dose constraint, the Eclipse mean BP D0.01 cm

conclusionsInstitution of a BP biologic dose constraint may reduce brachial plexopathy risk without compromising target coverage. MCBD plan evaluation provides valuable information to physicians that may assist in making clinical judgments regarding relative priority of target coverage versus normal tissue sparing.

Indexed as

Relative Biological EffectivenessAdultAgedBrachial Plexus NeuropathiesBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedMonte Carlo MethodProspective StudiesProton Therapy

Identifiers

PMID31494289
PMCPMC7734652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.