Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31494124›Full record

ReviewAdvanced drug delivery reviews

Pharmacokinetics of nanotechnology-based formulations in pediatric populations.

Venkata K Yellepeddi, Andrea Joseph, Elizabeth Nance

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advanced drug delivery reviews. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. State of the art in pediatric nanomedicines.Drug delivery and translational research · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Advances in Oral Drug Delivery.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Venkata K YellepeddiDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America; Department of Pharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Chemistry, College of Pharmacy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America. Electronic address: venkata.yellepeddi@hsc.utah.edu.
Andrea JosephDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Elizabeth NanceDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America; Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America; Center on Human Development and Disability, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America. Electronic address: eanance@uw.edu.
University of Washington · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research CenterU54HD083091 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI GARDEN, GWENN A · 2014 to 2019
$7.9M
Dendrimer nanoparticles for assessment of microglial activation and therapeutic response to neonatal brain injuryF31HD095572 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI JOSEPH, ANDREA · 2018 to 2020
$123k
NICHD NIH HHS F31 HD095572NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD083091
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of therapeutics for pediatric use has advanced in the last few decades. However, off-label use of adult medications in pediatrics remains a significant clinical problem. Furthermore, the development of therapeutics for pediatrics is challenged by the lack of pharmacokinetic (PK) data in the pediatric population. To promote the development of therapeutics for pediatrics, the United States Pediatric Formulation Initiative recommended the investigation of nanotechnology-based delivery systems. Therefore, in this review, we provided comprehensive information on the PK of nanotechnology-based formulations from preclinical and clinical studies in pediatrics. Specifically, we discuss the relationship between formulation parameters of nanoformulations and PK of the encapsulated drug in the context of pediatrics. We review nanoformulations that include dendrimers, liposomes, polymeric long-acting injectables (LAIs), nanocrystals, inorganic nanoparticles, polymeric micelles, and protein nanoparticles. In addition, we describe the importance and need of PK modeling and simulation approaches used in predicting PK of nanoformulations for pediatric applications.

Indexed as

Drug CompoundingNanotechnologyChildDendrimersDrug Delivery SystemsHumansLiposomesNanoparticlesPolymersDendrimersLiposomesPolymersHalf-lifeMaturationModeling and simulationNanotechnologyOntogenyPediatricsPharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID31494124
PMCPMC6893132
OpenAlexW2972289825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.