ArticleClinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia2019
Characterizing Lymphoma Incidence and Disparities for a Cancer Center Catchment Region.
Article in Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Racial Differences in the Molecular Genetic Biomarkers of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- New strategies for enhancing enrollment of underrepresented minorities in lymphoma clinical trials.Blood advances · 2025Review
- Genomic characterization of chronic lymphocytic leukemia in patients of African ancestry.Blood cancer journal · 2025Article
- Article
- Secondary malignancies in non-Hodgkin lymphoma survivors: 40 years of follow-up assessed by treatment modality.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
- Retrospective analysis of sepsis in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma reveals significantly greater risk in Black patients.Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · 2023Article
- Hepatitis B Virus and B-cell lymphoma: evidence, unmet need, clinical impact, and opportunities.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- Perceptions of clinical care and research among African-American patients with lymphoma.Leukemia & lymphoma · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRacial disparities in non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) are not well-elucidated for specific catchment areas, which can influence outcomes. Leveraging regional data from a population-based cancer registry may provide unique opportunities to quantify NHL disparities. MATERIALS AND
methodsUsing Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data for NHL cases diagnosed in Georgia from 2001 to 2015, we examined NHL incidence rates by lymphoma subtype and racial differences in baseline characteristics and outcomes for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and follicular lymphoma (FL). Cox regression models identified predictors of overall survival (OS).
resultsSEER documented 38,504 NHL cases in Georgia from 2001 to 2015. The age-adjusted incidence rate for NHL in Georgia increased 1.03% per year, and the annual percentage change was 1.72 in blacks compared with 0.84 in whites. Compared with whites, blacks with DLBCL and FL were more likely to be diagnosed at a younger age (DLBCL, 54.1 vs. 65.5 years; P < .0001; FL, 58.4 vs. 64.0 years; P < .0001) and with B symptoms (DLBCL, 44.4% vs. 33.4%; P < .0001; FL, 28.5% vs. 21.4%; P = .004). Across racial categories, age at diagnosis > 60 years, advanced stage, and B symptoms predicted worse OS in DLBCL and FL. Blacks with DLBCL more commonly were diagnosed with stage III/IV disease (55.5% vs. 48.1%; P < .0001) and had worse 5-year relative survival (58.8% vs. 62.3%; P = .01).
conclusionsRegional cancer registry data can be used to define incidence patterns and disparities in outcomes across NHL subtypes to help define key targets for interventions in a catchment area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.