Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31493791›Full record

SynthesisBMC neurology2019

Self-rated health after stroke: a systematic review of the literature.

Érika de Freitas Araújo, Ramon Távora Viana, Luci Fuscaldi Teixeira-Salmela, Lidiane Andrea Oliveira Lima, Christina Danielli Coelho de Morais Faria

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC neurology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Érika de Freitas AraújoGraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences of the Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Ramon Távora VianaGraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences of the Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Luci Fuscaldi Teixeira-SalmelaDepartment of Physical Therapy, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, (UFMG), Av. Antonio Carlos, 6627, Campus Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, MG, ZIP code 31270-901, Brazil.
Lidiane Andrea Oliveira LimaDepartment of Physical Therapy, Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC), Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.
Christina Danielli Coelho de Morais FariaDepartment of Physical Therapy, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, (UFMG), Av. Antonio Carlos, 6627, Campus Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, MG, ZIP code 31270-901, Brazil. cdcmf@ufmg.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9784-9729

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) Processo: 302494/2018-9Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) Finance Code 001Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG) CDS-PPM-00496-17Pró-reitoria de Pesquisa da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (PRPq/UFMG) 04/2018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSelf-rated health (SRH) allows for comparison and identification of the health status of various populations. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review of the literature to expand the understanding of SRH after stroke.

methodsThis systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42017056194) and conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Studies published until December 2018 that evaluated the SRH of adults with stroke were included.

resultsOf the 2132 identified studies, 51 were included. Only four studies had experimental designs (7.8%). In 60.7% of the studies, SRH was assessed by variations on direct questions (i.e., general and comparative SRH). Analog visual scales and quality of life instruments were also used to evaluate SRH, but there is no consensus regarding whether they are appropriate for this purpose. The results of cross-sectional and longitudinal studies revealed significant associations between poor SRH and stroke as well as between SRH, function, and disability. The power of SRH to predict stroke mortality is still uncertain. Two interventions (a home-based psychoeducational program concerning stroke health care and family involvement in functional rehabilitation) effectively improved SRH.

conclusionsDirect questions are the most common method of evaluating SRH after stroke. Studies reported significant associations between the SRH of individuals with stroke and several relevant health outcomes. However, few experimental studies have evaluated SRH after stroke. Interventions involving health education and family involvement had a significant impact on SRH.

Indexed as

Health StatusQuality of LifeAdultHumansStrokeCerebrovascular disordersHealth statusPerceived healthReviewSelf-assessmentSelf-rated healthStroke

Identifiers

PMID31493791
PMCPMC6731602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.