Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31493783›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2019

Combining mobile-health (mHealth) and artificial intelligence (AI) methods to avoid suicide attempts: the Smartcrises study protocol.

Sofian Berrouiguet, María Luisa Barrigón, Jorge Lopez Castroman, Philippe Courtet, Antonio Artés-Rodríguez, Enrique Baca-García

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03720730 (Sleep and Appetite Measures as Suicidal Risk Factors in a French- Spanish Cohort of Suicidal Patients.), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03720730 naunknown statusnot on this map

Sleep and Appetite Measures as Suicidal Risk Factors in a French- Spanish Cohort of Suicidal Patients.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, MontpellierRan2018 to 2026Enrolled1,044ConditionsPersonal History of a Recent Suicidal Crisis, Suicidal Ideation, Suicidal BehaviourArmsEMA
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Psychosocial interventions for self-harm in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Acceptability and satisfaction withFrontiers in psychiatry · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sofian BerrouiguetDepartment of Psychiatry and Emergency, Brest Medical University Hospital, Brest, France. sofian.berrouiguet@chu-brest.fr.
María Luisa BarrigónInserm U1061, La Colombières Hospital, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Jorge Lopez CastromanDepartment of Psychiatry, Autónoma University, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Philippe CourtetInserm U1061, CAC University Hospital of Nîmes, Nîmes, France.
Antonio Artés-RodríguezDepartment of Psychiatry, Autónoma University, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Enrique Baca-GarcíaDepartment of Psychiatry, Autónoma University, 28040, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe screening of digital footprint for clinical purposes relies on the capacity of wearable technologies to collect data and extract relevant information's for patient management. Artificial intelligence (AI) techniques allow processing of real-time observational information and continuously learning from data to build understanding. We designed a system able to get clinical sense from digital footprints based on the smartphone's native sensors and advanced machine learning and signal processing techniques in order to identify suicide risk. METHOD/

designThe Smartcrisis study is a cross-national comparative study. The study goal is to determine the relationship between suicide risk and changes in sleep quality and disturbed appetite. Outpatients from the Hospital Fundación Jiménez Díaz Psychiatry Department (Madrid, Spain) and the University Hospital of Nimes (France) will be proposed to participate to the study. Two smartphone applications and a wearable armband will be used to capture the data. In the intervention group, a smartphone application (MEmind) will allow for the ecological momentary assessment (EMA) data capture related with sleep, appetite and suicide ideations. DISCUSSION: Some concerns regarding data security might be raised. Our system complies with the highest level of security regarding patients' data. Several important ethical considerations related to EMA method must also be considered. EMA methods entails a non-negligible time commitment on behalf of the participants. EMA rely on daily, or sometimes more frequent, Smartphone notifications. Furthermore, recording participants' daily experiences in a continuous manner is an integral part of EMA. This approach may be significantly more than asking a participant to complete a retrospective questionnaire but also more accurate in terms of symptoms monitoring. Overall, we believe that Smartcrises could participate to a paradigm shift from the traditional identification of risks factors to personalized prevention strategies tailored to characteristics for each patient. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03720730. Retrospectively registered.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceWearable Electronic DevicesAdultAppetiteEcological Momentary AssessmentFemaleFranceHumansMalePolysomnographyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignSmartphoneSpainSuicide, AttemptedSurveys and QuestionnairesData miningSensorsSmartphoneSuicideWearables

Identifiers

PMID31493783
PMCPMC6731613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.