Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31493750›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2019

State-level marijuana policies and marijuana use and marijuana use disorder among a nationally representative sample of adults in the United States, 2015-2017: Sexual identity and gender matter.

Morgan M Philbin, Pia M Mauro, Emily R Greene, Silvia S Martins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Morgan M PhilbinDepartment of Sociomedical Sciences, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health. 722 West 168th Street, New York, NY, 10032 USA. Electronic address: mp3243@columbia.edu.
Pia M MauroDepartment of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health. 722 West 168th Street, New York, NY, 10032 USA. Electronic address: pm2838@columbia.edu.
Emily R GreeneDepartment of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health. 722 West 168th Street, New York, NY, 10032 USA. Electronic address: erg2138@columbia.edu.
Silvia S MartinsDepartment of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health. 722 West 168th Street, New York, NY, 10032 USA. Electronic address: ssm2183@columbia.edu.

Funding

State medical marijuana laws and NSDUH marijuana use and consequences since 2004R01DA037866 · NIDA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI MARTINS, SILVIA SABOIA · 2014 to 2018
$2.3M
Assessing the Impact of State-Level Policies on Drug Use and HIV Risk for YMSMK01DA039804 · NIDA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI PHILBIN, MORGAN MARI · 2016 to 2020
$888k
Multi-level associations between medical marijuana laws and substance use disorder treatmentK01DA045224 · NIDA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI MAURO, PIA M. · 2018 to 2022
$878k
NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA039804NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA045224NIDA NIH HHS L30 DA042436NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA037866
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResearch demonstrates an association between state-level medical marijuana laws (MMLs) and increased marijuana use (MU) and MU disorder (MUD) among adults, but has yet to explore this association among lesbian, gay and bisexual (LGB) individuals, including gender differences.

methodsWe pooled the 2015-2017 National Survey on Drug Use and Health data for adults (n = 126,463) and used gender-stratified adjusted multivariable logistic regression to model the odds of past-year MU, past-year medical MU, daily/near-daily MU, and MUD; we also tested the interaction between MML state residence and sexual identity.

resultsBisexual women had higher past-year MU (40% versus 10.3%; aOR = 2.9[2.4-3.4]), daily/near-daily MU (9.8% versus 1.5%; aOR = 4.6[3.3-6.2]), and medical MU ((5.5% versus 1.2%) aOR = 5.5[3.8-8.1]) than heterosexual women. Gay/lesbian women also had higher past-year MU (26.1% versus 10.3%; aOR = 2.8[2.2-3.7]), daily/near-daily MU (5.6% versus 1.5%; aOR = 2.9[1.8-4.6]), and medical MU (4.7% versus 1.2%; aOR = 3.0(1.4-6.6]) than heterosexual women. Bisexual women in MML states had higher past-year MU ((44.4% vs. 34.1%); aOR = 1.8[1.5-2.1]) and medical use (7.1% vs. 3.3% (aOR = 2.5[1.5-3.9]) than bisexual women in non-MML states. The odds of any past-year medical MU for bisexual versus heterosexual women was different in MML versus non-MML states (Exponentiated β = 0.53, p = 0.01). Gay men in MML states had higher past year MU (31.2% versus 25.7%; aOR = 1.6[1.1-2.5] and medical MU (6.4% vs 1.7%; aOR = 5.0[4.2-6.1]) than gay men in non-MML states.

conclusionsResults suggest that MMLs may differentially impact MU for sexual minority individuals-particularly bisexual women. Findings demonstrate the need for states enacting MMLs to consider potential differential impacts on LGB populations.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultDrug and Narcotic ControlFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMarijuana AbuseMarijuana UseMedical MarijuanaMiddle AgedSex FactorsSexual and Gender MinoritiesState GovernmentUnited StatesMedical MarijuanaGenderMarijuana useMedical marijuana lawsSexual minority individualsState-level policyUnited States

Identifiers

PMID31493750
PMCPMC6878202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.