Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31493489›Full record

ArticleThe journal of pain

AAAPT Diagnostic Criteria for Acute Pain Following Breast Surgery.

Kristin L Schreiber, Inna Belfer, Christine Miaskowski, Mark Schumacher, Brett R Stacey, Thomas Van De Ven

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of pain. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kristin L SchreiberDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address: klschreiber@bwh.harvard.edu.
Inna BelferNational Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland.
Christine MiaskowskiDepartment of Physiological Nursing, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Mark SchumacherDepartment of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, Division of Pain Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Brett R StaceyDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Thomas Van De VenDuke University Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.

Funding

Personalizing Perioperative Preventive Analgesia: Translational Studies Investigating the Biopsychosocial Underpinnings of Enhanced Pain PropensityR35GM128691 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI KRISTIN SCHREIBER · 2018 to 2026
$4.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM128691
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute pain after breast surgery decreases the quality of life of cancer survivors. Previous studies using a variety of definitions and methods report prevalence rates between 10% and 80%, which suggests the need for a comprehensive framework that can be used to guide assessment of acute pain and pain-related outcomes after breast surgery. A multidisciplinary task force with clinical and research expertise performed a focused review and synthesis and applied the 5 dimensional framework of the AAAPT (Analgesic, Anesthetic, and Addiction Clinical Trial Translations, Innovations, Opportunities, and Networks [ACTTION], American Academy of Pain Medicine [AAPM], American Pain Society [APS] Pain Taxonomy) to acute pain after breast surgery. Application of the AAAPT taxonomy yielded the following: 1) Core Criteria: Location, timing, severity, and impact of breast surgery pain were defined; 2) Common Features: Character and expected trajectories were established in relevant surgical subgroups, and common pain assessment tools for acute breast surgery pain identified; 3) Modulating Factors: Biological, psychological, and social factors that modulate interindividual variability were delineated; 4) Impact/Functional Consequences: Domains of impact were outlined and defined; 5) Neurobiologic Mechanisms: Putative mechanisms were specified ranging from nerve injury, inflammation, peripheral and central sensitization, to affective and social processing of pain. PERSPECTIVE: The AAAPT provides a framework to define and guide improved assessment of acute pain after breast surgery, which will enhance generalizability of results across studies and facilitate meta-analyses and studies of interindividual variation, and underlying mechanism. It will allow researchers and clinicians to better compare between treatments, across institutions, and with other types of acute pain.

Indexed as

Acute PainAdultBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMastectomyPlastic Surgery ProceduresPostoperative PainPractice Guidelines as TopicPsychosocial FunctioningSocieties, MedicalSocioeconomic FactorsAcute painmastectomypain assessmentpostsurgical painpsychosocialtaxonomy

Identifiers

PMID31493489
PMCPMC8290886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.