ArticleJournal of natural medicines2020
The origin identification method for crude drugs derived from arthropods and annelids using molecular biological techniques.
Article in Journal of natural medicines, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- ORBMO-RF: a non-destructive classification method for ginseng seeds based on multimodal fusion and improved red-billed blue magpie optimization algorithm.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Estimating included animal species in mixed crude drugs derived from animals using massively parallel sequencing.Scientific reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We evaluated whether the origins of crude drugs derived from arthropods and annelids could be identified using molecular biological techniques. DNA was extracted from 20 crude drugs prepared from different animals using a commercial kit with added phenol treatment. The target regions used to identify origin were the mitochondrial 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA), 12S rRNA, and cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) gene regions. Extracted DNA was amplified by polymerase chain reaction, and then sequenced by the Sanger method. The aligned sequences were compared with all available sequences using BLAST to estimate the origins of the crude drugs. The origin of crude drugs used in this study could be estimated using this method. The COI region was the best for identifying origin among three regions examined, based on the success rate of PCR amplification and analysis. Moreover, the 12S rRNA region was also useful for origin identification, with the exception of the earthworm. However, the origin of some crude drugs could not be strictly identified due to matches to various species in all three regions. One likely cause was that the species of origin of a crude drug has not been registered in DNA databases. We found that even the same crude drug from the same pharmaceutical company had different origins by production lot or import source country. Therefore, this method is useful not only for DNA-based origin identification but also quality control of production lots.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31493218What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.