Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31493187›Full record

SynthesisJournal of robotic surgery2020

Observational analysis of mesh related complications in urogynecologic procedures.

Bassel Abouzeid, Georges El Hasbani, Imad Mufarrij

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of robotic surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 83% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Bassel AbouzeidÉcole des Hautes Études en Santé Publique, Rennes, France. Bassel.abouzeid@gmail.com.
Georges El HasbaniAmerican University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Imad MufarrijThe George Washington University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
American University of Beirut · LBÉcole des Hautes Études en Santé Publique · FRGeorge Washington University Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the 1990s, the use of mesh has expanded in gynecologic surgeries in the aim of correcting pelvic organ prolapse. Because there has been a lot of complications that were reported, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has requested the withdrawal of many products from the market. Recently, many countries have called for the suspension of vaginal mesh products from the market. The objective of this review is to analyze the incidence of the complications that arise after vaginal mesh surgeries with an insight to the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommendations on the management of those complications.

Indexed as

FemaleHumansPelvic Organ ProlapseSurgical MeshUrogenital Surgical ProceduresGraft complicationsMesh usePelvic organ prolapse

Identifiers

PMID31493187
OpenAlexW2971979303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.