Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31493176›Full record

ArticleCancer chemotherapy and pharmacology2019

Development of a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model for intravenous lenalidomide in mice.

Jim H Hughes, Richard N Upton, Stephanie E Reuter, Darlene M Rozewski, Mitch A Phelps, David J R Foster

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Repurposing Pomalidomide as a Neuroprotective Drug: Efficacy in an Alpha-Synuclein-Based Model of Parkinson's Disease.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jim H HughesSchool of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of South Australia, North Terrace, Adelaide, 5001, Australia. jim.hughes@mymail.unisa.edu.au.
Richard N UptonSchool of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of South Australia, North Terrace, Adelaide, 5001, Australia.
Stephanie E ReuterSchool of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of South Australia, North Terrace, Adelaide, 5001, Australia.
Darlene M RozewskiComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Mitch A PhelpsComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
David J R FosterSchool of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of South Australia, North Terrace, Adelaide, 5001, Australia.
University of South Australia · AUThe Ohio State University · US

Funding

Overcoming IMiD resistance in MyelomaR01CA201382 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HOFMEISTER, CRAIG C., PHELPS, MITCH A · 2016 to 2020
$2.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA201382NIH HHS R01CA201382
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLenalidomide is used widely in B-cell malignancies for its immunomodulatory activity. It is primarily eliminated via the kidneys, with a significant proportion of renal elimination attributed to active processes. Lenalidomide is a weak substrate of P-glycoprotein (P-gp), though it is unclear whether P-gp is solely responsible for lenalidomide transport. This study aimed to determine whether the current knowledge of lenalidomide was sufficient to describe the pharmacokinetics of lenalidomide in multiple tissues.

methodsA physiologically based pharmacokinetic model was developed using the Open Systems Pharmacology Suite to explore the pharmacokinetics of lenalidomide in a variety of tissues. Data were available for mice dosed intravenously at 0.5, 1.5, 5, and 10 mg/kg, with concentrations measured in plasma, brain, heart, kidney, liver, lung, muscle, and spleen. P-gp expression and activity were sourced from the literature.

resultsThe model predictions in plasma, liver, and lung were representative of the observed data (median prediction error 13%, - 10%, and 30%, respectively, with 90% confidence intervals including zero), while other tissue predictions showed sufficient similarity to the observed data. Contrary to the data, model predictions for the brain showed no drug reaching brain tissue when P-gp was expressed at the blood-brain barrier. The data were better described by basolateral transporters at the intracellular wall. Local sensitivity analysis showed that transporter activity was the most sensitive parameter in these models for exposure.

conclusionAs P-gp transport at the blood-brain barrier did not explain the observed brain concentrations alone, there may be other transporters involved in lenalidomide disposition.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAdministration, IntravenousAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1Blood-Brain BarrierBrainDose-Response Relationship, DrugLenalidomideMiceMice, Inbred ICRTissue DistributionAntineoplastic AgentsATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1LenalidomideDistributionLenalidomideMousePhysiologically based pharmacokineticsTransporters

Identifiers

PMID31493176
PMCPMC7375688
OpenAlexW2971548279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.