Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31493127›Full record

ReviewProbiotics and antimicrobial proteins2019

Probiotics and Psychobiotics: the Role of Microbial Neurochemicals.

Alexander V Oleskin, Boris A Shenderov

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Frontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. A Narrative Review on the Advance of Probiotics to Metabiotics.Journal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Heat-KilledBrain sciences · 2023
    Article
  19. Whole-Genome Sequence ofMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alexander V OleskinGeneral Ecology Department, School of Biology, Moscow State University, Vorobiev Hills, Moscow, Russia, 119991. aoleskin@rambler.ru.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6816-1615
Boris A ShenderovLaboratory of Bacteriology and Parasitology, Centre for Strategic Planning, Russian Ministry of Health; Moscow, Research Laboratory for Design & Implementation of Personalized Nutrition-Related Products & Diets, K. G. Razumovsky University of Technology & Management, Moscow, Russia.
Center for Strategic Research · RULomonosov Moscow State University · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In light of recent data, microorganisms should be construed as organisms that are capable of communication and collective behaviors. Microbial communication signals are involved both in interactions among microbial cells within microbial social systems, including the human body-inhabiting microconsortium, and the dialog between the microbiota and the host organism. The microbiota inhabits various niches of the host organism, especially the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Microorganisms release diverse signal molecules and, in addition, specifically respond to host signals. This enables them to constantly interact with the nervous system including the brain and the immune system of the host organism. Evolutionarily conserved signals that are involved in the communication between microbiota and the host include neuroactive substances (neurochemicals) such as peptides, amino acids, biogenic amines, short-chain fatty acids, and gaseous substances. This ongoing dialog may either stabilize the host's physical and mental health state or, alternatively, cause serious health problems. Attempts are made to correct imbalances in the brain-gut-microbiota axis with probiotics including their subgroup called psychobiotics that release neuroactive substances directly influencing the human brain, psyche, and behavior. A number of recent review works address the microbiota-host system and its communication signals. Some of the publications focus on the involvement of neurochemicals in the bidirectional communication within the host-microbiota system. However, this work concentrates on the impact of bacterial cell components, metabolites, and signal molecules as promising alternatives to the currently widespread probiotics that have both advantages and disadvantages. Such biologically active agents of microbial origin are referred to as postbiotics or, alternatively, metabiotics (the term preferred in this work).

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsBacteriaBehaviorBrainFatty Acids, VolatileHumansNeurotransmitter AgentsProbioticsFatty Acids, VolatileNeurotransmitter AgentsBiofilmsBiogenic aminesImmune systemMetabioticsNervous systemNeuroactive amino acidsNeurochemicalsProbioticsPsychobioticsShort-chain fatty acids

Identifiers

PMID31493127
OpenAlexW2971434421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.