ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2019
Improved chromium reduction and removal from wastewater in continuous flow bioelectrochemical systems.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reparation of nano-FeS by ultrasonic precipitation for treatment of acidic chromium-containing wastewater.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Elimination of Cr(VI) from chromium slag with poplar lignin by electrochemical treatment in sulfuric acid solution.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bioelectrochemical systems (BESs) including microbial electrolysis cells (MECs) and microbial fuel cells (MFCs) are promising for hexavalent chromium [Cr(VI)] reduction and total chromium (Cr) removal from wastewater. This study assessed the performance of simple, inexpensive, and continuous flow BESs with neither cathode catalyst nor proton exchange membrane for Cr(VI) reduction and total Cr removal. The effect of bioreactor configuration and wastewater feed mode on the performance of the BESs was investigated. Biological Cr(VI) reduction in the MEC followed a first-order kinetics with a rate constant of 0.103 d
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.