Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31493018›Full record

ReviewCurrent genetics2020

Opportunities for new studies of nuclear DNA replication enzymology in budding yeast.

Marta A Garbacz, Scott A Lujan, Thomas A Kunkel

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Marta A GarbaczInstitute of Molecular Biology (IMB), Ackermannweg 4, 55128, Mainz, Germany.
Scott A LujanGenome Integrity and Structural Biology Laboratory, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, NIEHS, NIH, DHHS, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, USA.
Thomas A KunkelGenome Integrity and Structural Biology Laboratory, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, NIEHS, NIH, DHHS, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, USA. kunkel@niehs.nih.gov.
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences · USInstitute of Molecular Biology · DE

Funding

Structure-Function Studies Of DNA Replication FidelityZIAES065070 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI KUNKEL, THOMAS A · 2009 to 2025
$30.6M
Structure-Function Studies Of DNA Replication FidelityZ01ES065070 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI KUNKEL, THOMAS A · 1991 to 2008
$4.3M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 ES065070NIEHS NIH HHS Z01 ES065070
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three major eukaryotic DNA polymerases, Polymerases α, δ, and ε (Pols α, δ, and ε), perform the fundamental process of DNA synthesis at the replication fork both accurately and efficiently. In trying to understand the necessity and flexibility of the polymerase usage, we recently reported that budding yeast cells lacking Pol ε exonuclease and polymerase domains (pol2-16) survive, but have severe growth defects, checkpoint activation, increased level of dNTP pools as well as significant increase in the mutation rates. Herein, we suggest new opportunities to distinguish the roles of Pol ε from those of two other eukaryotic B-family DNA polymerases, Pols δ and ζ.

Indexed as

DNA ReplicationDNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseFungal ProteinsSaccharomycetalesDNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseFungal ProteinsDNA polymerasesDNA replicationGenome stabilityPolymerase delta (Pol δ)Polymerase epsilon (Pol ε)Polymerase zeta (Pol ζ)

Identifiers

PMID31493018
PMCPMC7058513
OpenAlexW2972258921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.