Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31492990›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2019

Recruitment gain of spinal motor neuron pools in cat and human.

J B Nielsen, H Morita, R Wenzelburger, G Deuschl, J-P Gossard, H Hultborn

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

J B NielsenDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3, 2200, Copenhagen N, Denmark. jbnielsen@sund.ku.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5568-2916
H MoritaCenter for Health, Safety and Environmental Management, Shinshu University, Matsumoto, Japan.
R WenzelburgerDepartment of Neurology, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
G DeuschlDepartment of Neurology, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
J-P GossardGroupe de Recherche sur le Système Nerveux Central, Department of Neurosciences, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, H3T 1J4, Canada.
H HultbornDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3, 2200, Copenhagen N, Denmark.
Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel · DEUniversity of Copenhagen · DKShinshu University · JPUniversité de Montréal · CA

Funding

Elsass Fonden (DK) 18-16
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The output from a motor nucleus is determined by the synaptic input to the motor neurons and their intrinsic properties. Here, we explore whether the source of synaptic inputs to the motor neurons (cats) and the age or post-stroke conditions (humans) may change the recruitment gain of the motor neuron pool. In cats, the size of Ia EPSPs in triceps surae motor neurons (input) and monosynaptic reflexes (MSRs; output) was recorded in the soleus and medial gastrocnemius motor nerves following graded stimulation of dorsal roots. The MSR was plotted against the EPSP thereby obtaining a measure of the recruitment gain. Conditioning stimulation of sural and peroneal cutaneous afferents caused significant increase in the recruitment gain of the medial gastrocnemius, but not the soleus motor neuron pool. In humans, the discharge probability of individual soleus motor units (input) and soleus H-reflexes (output) was performed. With graded stimulation of the tibial nerve, the gain of the motor neuron pool was assessed as the slope of the relation between probability of firing and the reflex size. The gain in young subjects was higher than in elderly subjects. The gain in post-stroke survivors was higher than in age-matched neurologically intact subjects. These findings provide experimental evidence that recruitment gain of a motor neuron pool contributes to the regulation of movement at the final output stage from the spinal cord and should be considered when interpreting changes in reflex excitability in relation to movement or injuries of the nervous system.

Indexed as

AdultAfferent PathwaysAgedAgingAnimalsCatsExcitatory Postsynaptic PotentialsH-ReflexHumansMotor NeuronsMuscle, SkeletalPatch-Clamp TechniquesReflex, MonosynapticSciatic NerveSpinal CordStrokeAgeingCutaneous afferentsMotor neuronsRecruitmentStroke

Identifiers

PMID31492990
OpenAlexW2971830194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.