Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31492980›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2020

Root Pulp Visibility as a mandibular maturity marker at the 18-year threshold in the Maltese population.

Fatemah Al Qattan, Emad Eddin Alzoubi, Victoria Lucas, Graham Roberts, Fraser McDonald, Simon Camilleri

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fatemah Al QattanDepartment of Child Dental Health and Orthodontics, Faculty of Dental Surgery, University of Malta, Msida, Malta.
Emad Eddin AlzoubiDepartment of Child Dental Health and Orthodontics, Faculty of Dental Surgery, University of Malta, Msida, Malta.
Victoria LucasFaculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Graham RobertsFaculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Fraser McDonaldFaculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Simon CamilleriDepartment of Child Dental Health and Orthodontics, Faculty of Dental Surgery, University of Malta, Msida, Malta. simon.camilleri@um.edu.mt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8306-6491

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe determination of age of majority (the 18-year-old threshold) using the popular Demirjian tooth staging method is unreliable, so other maturity markers are required. This study examines whether the Root Pulp Visibility (RPV) of the mandibular third molar is a useful indicator of age.

methodsOne thousand six dental panoramic radiographs (DPTs) were examined and the left mandibular third molar assessed according to the RPV stages using the method of Olze et al. (Int J Legal Med 124:183-186, 2010) as modified by Lucas et al. (Forensic Sci Int 270:98-102, 2017). Six hundred sixty-two DPTs, 288 males and 374 females, satisfied the inclusion criteria.

resultsIndividuals who had reached stages RPV-A and RPV-B were represented in a wide range of ages spanning the 18-year-old threshold. Individuals who had reached stages RPV-C and RPV-D were all above the 18-year-old threshold. It was not possible to analyse a large number of DPTs for various reasons. DISCUSSION: Individuals whose mandibular third molar exhibited stages RPV-C and RPV-D may be deemed to have reached the age of majority. These results are consistent with other published studies. Variation in the rate of development of the third molar limits the applicability of this method.

conclusionsRPV staging is an accurate method of determining the 18-year-old threshold. Substitute methods are required in a large number of cases.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAge Determination by TeethData AnalysisData CollectionDental PulpFemaleForensic DentistryHumansMaleMaltaMandibleMolar, ThirdRadiography, PanoramicRetrospective StudiesTooth RootDental age estimationDental panoramic tomogramRoot Pulp VisibilityThird molar

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.