Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31492932›Full record

ArticleModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2020

Prognostic implications of genotyping and p16 immunostaining in HPV-positive tumors of the uterine cervix.

Inmaculada Nicolás, Adela Saco, Esther Barnadas, Lorena Marimon, Natalia Rakislova, Pere Fusté, Angeles Rovirosa, Lydia Gaba, Laura Buñesch, Blanca Gil-Ibañez and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Pathology according to p53 Pathway.Pathobiology : journal of immunopathology, molecular and cellular biology · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. p16Clinical and translational medicine · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. 2020 WHO Classification of Female Genital Tumors.Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2021
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. The Role of the Metabolic Parameters ofFrontiers in oncology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Inmaculada NicolásInstitute Clinic of Gynecology, Obstetrics, and Neonatology, Hospital Clínic - Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9600-8434
Adela SacoDepartment of Pathology, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Esther BarnadasDepartment of Pathology, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Lorena MarimonDepartment of Pathology, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Natalia RakislovaDepartment of Pathology, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Pere FustéInstitute Clinic of Gynecology, Obstetrics, and Neonatology, Hospital Clínic - Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Angeles RovirosaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Lydia GabaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Laura BuñeschDepartment of Radiology, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Blanca Gil-IbañezInstitute Clinic of Gynecology, Obstetrics, and Neonatology, Hospital Clínic - Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Jaume PahisaInstitute Clinic of Gynecology, Obstetrics, and Neonatology, Hospital Clínic - Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Berta Díaz-FeijooInstitute Clinic of Gynecology, Obstetrics, and Neonatology, Hospital Clínic - Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Aureli TorneInstitute Clinic of Gynecology, Obstetrics, and Neonatology, Hospital Clínic - Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Jaume OrdiDepartment of Pathology, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Marta Del PinoInstitute Clinic of Gynecology, Obstetrics, and Neonatology, Hospital Clínic - Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. mdelpino@clinic.cat.
Consorci Institut D'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer · ESBarcelona Institute for Global Health · ESUniversitat de Barcelona · ESHospital Clínic de Barcelona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human papillomaviruses (HPVs) are the causative agents of carcinoma of the uterine cervix. A number of HPV genotypes have been associated with cervical cancer and almost all tumors associated with HPV show strong p16 expression. However, there is little information on the possible impact of the HPV genotype and p16 immunostaining on the clinicopathological features or their prognostic value in cervical carcinoma. We evaluated a series of 194 patients with HPV-positive cervical cancers treated at our institution, focusing on the clinicopathological features and the relationship of the HPV genotypes and p16 immunostaining with the prognosis. A single HPV type was identified in 149 (77%) tumors, multiple HPV infection was detected in 30 cases (15%), and undetermined HPV type/s were identified in 15 (8%) carcinomas. HPV 16 and/or 18 were detected in 156 (80%) tumors. p16 was positive in 186 (96%) carcinomas, but eight tumors (4%) were negative for p16 (seven squamous cell carcinomas, one adenocarcinoma); 5/8 caused by HPV 16 and/or 18. Patients with HPV 16 and/or 18 were younger (49 ± 15 vs. 57 ± 17 years, p < 0.01) and more frequently had nonsquamous tumors than patients with other HPV types (24% [37/156] vs. 0% [0/38]; p = 0.01). Neither the HPV type nor multiple infection showed any prognostic impact. Patients with p16-negative tumors showed a significantly worse overall survival than women with p16-positive carcinomas (45 vs. 156 months, p = 0.03), although no significant differences in disease-free survival were observed. In the multivariate analysis, negative p16 immunostaining was associated with a worse overall survival together with advanced FIGO stage and lymph node metastases. In conclusion, the HPV genotype has limited clinical utility and does not seem to have prognostic value in cervical cancer. In contrast, a negative p16 result in patients with HPV-positive tumors is a prognostic marker associated with a poor overall survival.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorCarcinomaCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16Disease-Free SurvivalFemaleHuman papillomavirus 16Human papillomavirus 18HumansImmunohistochemistryMiddle AgedPapillomavirus InfectionsPrognosisUterine Cervical NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorCDKN2A protein, humanCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16

Identifiers

PMID31492932
OpenAlexW2972164119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.