ArticleScientific reports2019
Pseudomonas spp. are key players in agricultural biogas substrate degradation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Designing synthetic microbial communities for enhanced anaerobic waste treatment.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2025Review
- Comparison of microbiome community structure and dynamics during anaerobic digestion of different renewable solid wastes.Current research in microbial sciences · 2025Article
- Uncovering Microbiome Adaptations in a Full-Scale Biogas Plant: Insights from MAG-Centric Metagenomics and Metaproteomics.Microorganisms · 2023Article
- The Potential of Digested Sludge-Assimilating Microflora for Biogas Production from Food Processing Wastes.Microorganisms · 2023Article
- Development of a Multicomponent Microbiological Soil Inoculant and Its Performance in Sweet Potato Cultivation.Microorganisms · 2023Article
- Effects of phenyl acids on different degradation phases during thermophilic anaerobic digestion.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Profiling temporal dynamics of acetogenic communities in anaerobic digesters using next-generation sequencing and T-RFLP.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- A comparative analysis of biogas production from tomato bio-waste in mesophilic batch and continuous anaerobic digestion systems.PloS one · 2021Article
- Microbiological Surveillance of Biogas Plants: Targeting Acetogenic Community.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anaerobic degradation (AD) of heterogeneous agricultural substrates is a complex process involving a diverse microbial community. While microbial community composition of a variety of biogas plants (BPs) is well described, little is known about metabolic processes and microbial interaction patterns. Here, we analyzed 16 large-scale BPs using metaproteomics. All metabolic steps of AD were observed in the metaproteome, and multivariate analyses indicated that they were shaped by temperature, pH, volatile fatty acid content and substrate types. Biogas plants could be subdivided into hydrogenotrophic, acetoclastic or a mixture of both methanogenic pathways based on their process parameters, taxonomic and functional metaproteome. Network analyses showed large differences in metabolic and microbial interaction patterns. Both, number of interactions and interaction partners were highly dependent on the prevalent methanogenic pathway for most species. Nevertheless, we observed a highly conserved metabolism of different abundant Pseudomonas spp. for all BPs indicating a key role during AD in carbohydrate hydrolysis irrespectively of variabilities in substrate input and process parameters. Thus, Pseudomonas spp. are of high importance for robust and versatile AD food webs, which highlight a large variety of downstream metabolic processes for their respective methanogenic pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.