Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31492811›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019

Subcortical connectivity correlates selectively with attention's effects on spatial choice bias.

Varsha Sreenivasan, Devarajan Sridharan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. An ancestral anatomical and spatial bias for visually guided behavior.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  14. Attention in Psychology, Neuroscience, and Machine Learning.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2020
    Review
  15. Subcortical connectivity correlates selectively with attention's effects on spatial choice bias.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Varsha SreenivasanCentre for Neuroscience, Indian Institute of Science, 560012 Bangalore, India varshas@iisc.ac.in sridhar@iisc.ac.in.
Devarajan SridharanCentre for Neuroscience, Indian Institute of Science, 560012 Bangalore, India varshas@iisc.ac.in sridhar@iisc.ac.in.ORCID 0000-0003-1998-9018

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neural mechanisms of attention are extensively studied in the neocortex; comparatively little is known about how subcortical regions contribute to attention. The superior colliculus (SC) is an evolutionarily conserved, subcortical (midbrain) structure that has been implicated in controlling visuospatial attention. Yet how the SC contributes mechanistically to attention remains unknown. We investigated the role of the SC in attention, combining model-based psychophysics, diffusion imaging, and tractography in human participants. Specifically, we asked whether the SC contributes to enhancing sensitivity (d') to attended information, or whether it contributes to biasing choices (criteria) in favor of attended information. We tested human participants on a multialternative change detection task, with endogenous spatial cueing, and quantified sensitivity and bias with a recently developed multidimensional signal detection model (m-ADC model). At baseline, sensitivity and bias exhibited complementary patterns of asymmetries across the visual hemifields: While sensitivity was consistently higher for detecting changes in the left hemifield, bias was higher for reporting changes in the right hemifield. Remarkably, white matter connectivity of the SC with the neocortex mirrored this pattern of asymmetries. Specifically, the asymmetry in SC-cortex connectivity correlated with the asymmetry in choice bias, but not in sensitivity. In addition, SC-cortex connectivity strength could predict cueing-induced modulation of bias, but not of sensitivity, across individuals. In summary, the SC may be a key node in an evolutionarily conserved network for controlling choice bias during visuospatial attention.

Indexed as

AdultAttentionBiasBrain MappingChoice BehaviorConnectomeCuesFemaleHumansMaleMesencephalonPhotic StimulationSelection BiasSuperior ColliculiVisual Perceptionasymmetryattention componentschoice biassensitivitysuperior colliculus connectivity

Identifiers

PMID31492811
PMCPMC6765279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.