ReviewPhilosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM2019
The moral imperative to approve pregnant women's participation in randomized clinical trials for pregnancy and newborn complications.
Review in Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Safety of psychotropic medications in pregnancy: an umbrella review.Molecular psychiatry · 2025Pooled it
- Identifying Pregnancies in Population-Based Data Sources: Development and Application of the ConcePTION Pregnancy Algorithm.Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety · 2026Article
- Bridging disciplinary siloes: a scoping review on the inclusion and exclusion of pregnant and lactating populations in clinical research.BMJ public health · 2026Article
- Article
- The risk tolerance and decision-making processes of Australian women regarding medication trials in pregnancy.The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology · 2025Article
- The role of pharmacological interventions in managing urological complications during pregnancy and childbirth: A review.Medicine · 2025Review
- Digital twin-enhanced three-organ microphysiological system for studying drug pharmacokinetics in pregnant women.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Nanomedicine for Maternal and Fetal Health.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2024Review
- Sex and gender in infection and immunity: addressing the bottlenecks from basic science to public health and clinical applications.Royal Society open science · 2023Article
- Sex as a Biological Variable in Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine.Annual review of biomedical engineering · 2023Review
- For better care we need better data: towards a national obstetrics registry.American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM · 2023Review
- Improving Development of Drug Treatments for Pregnant Women and the Fetus.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2022Review
- Clinical Assessment of Fetal Well-Being and Fetal Safety Indicators.Journal of clinical pharmacology · 2022Review
- Re-orienting anti-malarial drug development to better serve pregnant women.Malaria journal · 2022Article
- Computational Models on Pathological Redox Signalling Driven by Pregnancy: A Review.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- From Inception to ConcePTION: Genesis of a Network to Support Better Monitoring and Communication of Medication Safety During Pregnancy and Breastfeeding.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2022Article
- Pandemics and maternal health: the indirect effects of COVID-19.Anaesthesia · 2021Review
- Placental transfer and safety in pregnancy of medications under investigation to treat coronavirus disease 2019.American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM · 2020Review
- Dancing During Labor: Are Women Down to Boogie?Journal of patient-centered research and reviews · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThere is longstanding consensus on the need to include pregnant women in research. The goal of clinical research is to find highly regulated, carefully controlled, morally responsible ways to generate evidence about how to effectively and safely prevent illness or treat sick people. This manuscripts present a conceptual analysis of the ethicality of clinical trials in 3 scenarios: where the pregnant is involved in clinical trials as a participant during pregnancy for data that addresses pregnancy complications, where the pregnant woman consents to clinical trial participation for an unborn baby that has complications, to generate data on complications at this stage of life, and where the mother may consent for participation of their newborn child in clinical trials.
methodsConceptual analysis.
findingsInvestigators often choose to exclude pregnant women and newborns from research, even where there is possibility for them to benefit from the study intervention. Objections include vulnerability of pregnant women, altered pharmacokinetics and risk of adverse effects, with a need to balance potential maternal and fetal risks and benefits of research participation. While the objections may be valid, not performing research magnifies what should be a carefully controlled risk during research, pushing this risk into the clinical setting, and subsequently posing a challenge to clinicians who are faced with making treatment decisions for pregnant patients with limited evidence of efficacy and safety. The potential benefits of fair inclusion in clinical trials outweigh the potential risks.
conclusionResearch involving pregnant women is necessary to provide women with effective treatment during pregnancy, to promote fetal safety (such as by avoiding the clinical use of drugs that may be harmful to the developing fetus), and to reduce avoidable harm from suboptimal care (such as from underdosing) and to provide pregnant women, their fetuses and newborns (with access to potential benefits of research participation).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.