Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31492168›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2019

Safety of an extended-release injectable moxidectin suspension formulation (ProHeart

Matthew J Krautmann, Sean Mahabir, Ann Fielder, Wendy Collard, Tracie L Wolthuis, Kevin Esch, Tracy Morton, Kent Alleman, Laibin Luo, Erin McCandless and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Use of Slow-Release Injectable Moxidectin for Treatment ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Matthew J KrautmannZoetis, Kalamazoo, MI, 49007, USA. matthew.j.krautmann@zoetis.com.
Sean MahabirZoetis, Kalamazoo, MI, 49007, USA.
Ann FielderZoetis, Kalamazoo, MI, 49007, USA.
Wendy CollardZoetis, Kalamazoo, MI, 49007, USA.
Tracie L WolthuisZoetis, Kalamazoo, MI, 49007, USA.
Kevin EschZoetis, Kalamazoo, MI, 49007, USA.
Tracy MortonZoetis, Kalamazoo, MI, 49007, USA.
Kent AllemanZoetis, Kalamazoo, MI, 49007, USA.
Laibin LuoZoetis, Kalamazoo, MI, 49007, USA.
Erin McCandlessZoetis, Kalamazoo, MI, 49007, USA.
Steven NederveldZoetis, Kalamazoo, MI, 49007, USA.
Kristina KrydaZoetis, Kalamazoo, MI, 49007, USA.
Ryan CarrollZoetis, Kalamazoo, MI, 49007, USA.
Joseph F BoucherZoetis, Kalamazoo, MI, 49007, USA.
Zoetis (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe safety of ProHeart® 12 (PH 12; extended-release injectable suspension; 10% moxidectin in glyceryl tristearate microspheres) was evaluated in four studies using Beagle dogs and one study using ivermectin-sensitive Collies. The recommended dose is 0.5 mg/kg subcutaneously once yearly.

methodsStudy 1: safety margin was evaluated as 3 treatments of PH 12 (0× (control); 1× (recommended dose); 3× (3 times recommended dose) and 5× (5 times recommended dose) in 12 months via clinical observations, body weights, food consumption, injection site observations, physical examinations, moxidectin tissue assay, pharmacokinetics, and clinical and anatomic pathology. Study 2: safety in breeding-age males was demonstrated by semen testing at 14-day intervals from Day 7 to Day 91 post-treatment (0× or 3×). Study 3: reproductive safety in females was demonstrated by monitoring dams and litters following treatments (0× or 3×) administered during breeding, gestation, or lactation. Study 4: safety in dogs surgically implanted with adult heartworms was evaluated by clinical and laboratory monitoring following treatment with 0× or 3× administered 61 days post-implantation. Study 5: safety in ivermectin-sensitive dogs (120 µg/kg SC) was by clinical monitoring for 1 week after administering 1×, 3× or 5×.

resultsStudy 1: slight swelling clinically detectable at some 3× and 5× injection sites was characterized microscopically as granulomatous inflammation, like tissue responses to medical implants, interpreted as non-adverse. Pharmacokinetics were dose-proportional and there was little or no systemic accumulation. Residual moxidectin mean (range) at 1× injection sites after 1 year was 16.0% (0.045-37.6%) of the administered mass. Studies 2 and 3: no effects were identified in reproductive indices (females) or semen quality characteristics (males). Study 4: PH 12 produced marked reductions in circulating microfilariae and lower numbers of adult heartworms, but no adverse clinical signs were identified. Study 5: there were no abnormal clinical signs at 1×, 3× or 5× overdoses of PH 12 in ivermectin-sensitive dogs.

conclusionsPH 12 has a > 5× safety margin in both normal and ivermectin-sensitive dogs, has no effects on canine reproduction, and is well tolerated in heartworm-positive dogs. The only treatment-related finding was non-adverse, granulomatous inflammation at the injection site.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntinematodal AgentsDelayed-Action PreparationsDog DiseasesDogsDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsHeartwater DiseaseInjectionsMacrolidesSuspensionsTreatment OutcomeAntinematodal AgentsDelayed-Action PreparationsMacrolidesmoxidectinSuspensionsDogMoxidectinProHeart® 12ProHeart® SR-12SafetyToxicology

Identifiers

PMID31492168
PMCPMC6728954
OpenAlexW2971787834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.