ArticleBiomedical engineering online2019
PIV investigation of the flow fields in subject-specific vertebro-basilar (VA-BA) junction.
Article in Biomedical engineering online, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAs the only arterial structure of which two main arteries merged into one, the vertebro-basilar (VA-BA) system is one of the favorite sites of cerebral atherosclerotic plaques. The aim of this study was to investigate the detailed hemodynamics characteristics in the VA-BA system.
methodsA scale-up subject-specific flow phantom of VA-BA system was fabricated based on the computed tomography angiography (CTA) scanning images of a healthy adult. Flow fields in eight axial planes and six radial planes were measured and analyzed by using particle image velocimetry (PIV) under steady flow conditions of [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]. A water-glycerin mixture was used as the working fluid.
resultsThe flow in the current model exhibited highly three-dimensional characteristics. The confluence of VAs flow formed bimodal velocity distribution near the confluence apex. Due to the asymmetrical structural configuration, the bimodal velocity profile skewed towards left, and sharper peaks were observed under higher Reynolds condition. Secondary flow characterized by two vortices formed in the radial planes where 10 mm downstream the confluence apex and persists along the BA under both Reynolds numbers. The strength of secondary flow under [Formula: see text] is around 8% higher than that under [Formula: see text], and decayed nonlinearly along the flow direction. In addition, a low momentum recirculation region induced by boundary layer separation was observed near the confluence apex. The wall shear stress (WSS) in the recirculation area was found to be lower than 0.4 Pa. This region coincides well with the preferential site of vascular lesions in the VA-BA system.
conclusionsThis preliminary study verified that the subject-specific in-vitro experiment is capable of reflecting the detailed flow features in the VA-BA system. The findings from this study may help to expand the understanding of the hemodynamics in the VA-BA system, and further clarifying the mechanism that underlying the localization of vascular lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.