Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31492134›Full record

Observational studyBMC health services research2019

Effects of implementing free maternity service policy in Kenya: an interrupted time series analysis.

Evaline Lang'at, Lillian Mwanri, Marleen Temmerman

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC health services research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
12.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Does a free maternity policy in Kenya work? Impact and cost-benefit consideration based on demographic health survey data.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Evaline Lang'atDepartment of Health, County Government of Kilifi, P. O Box 9-80108, Kilifi, Kenya. langat.eva@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6673-0039
Lillian MwanriSouth Australia College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Flinders University Registry Road, Bedford Park, South Australia, 5042, Australia.
Marleen TemmermanDirector at Centre of Excellence in Women and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Aga Khan University Hospital, P.O. Box 30270-00100, Nairobi, Kenya.
Flinders University · AU

Funding

Afya Bora Consortium (Health Resources and Service Administration U91HA06801B) P30AI027757
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMaternal and perinatal mortality is a major public health concern across the globe and more so in low and middle-income countries. In Kenya, more than 6000 maternal deaths, and 35,000 stillbirths occur each year. The Government of Kenya abolished user fee for maternity care under the Free Maternity Service policy, in June of 2013 in all public health facilities, a move to make maternity services accessible and affordable, and to reduce maternal and perinatal mortality.

methodAn observational retrospective study was carried out in 3 counties in Kenya. Six maternal health output indicators were observed monthly, 2 years pre and 2 years post- policy implementation. Data was collected from daily maternity registers in 90 public health facilities across the 3 counties all serving an estimated population of 3 million people. Interrupted Time Series Analysis (ITSA) with a single group was used to assess the effects of the policy. Standard linear regression using generalized least squares (gls) model, was used to run the results for each of the six variables of interest. Absolute and relative changes were calculated using the gls model coefficients.

resultsSignificant sustained increase of 89, 97, and 98% was observed in the antenatal care visits, health facility deliveries, and live births respectively, after the policy implementation. An immediate and significant increase of 27% was also noted for those women who received Emergency Obstetric Care (EmONC) services in either the level 5, 4 and 3 health facilities. No significant changes were observed in the stillbirth rate and caesarean section rate following policy implementation.

conclusionAfter 2 years of implementing the Free Maternity Service policy in Kenya, immediate and sustained increase in the use of skilled care during pregnancy and childbirth was observed. The study suggest that hospital cost is a major expense incurred by most women and their families whilst seeking maternity care services and a barrier to maternity care utilization. Overall, Free Maternity Service policy, as a health financing strategy, has exhibited the potential of realizing the full beneficial effects of maternal morbidity and mortality reduction by increasing access to skilled care.

Indexed as

Maternal Health ServicesCesarean SectionDelivery, ObstetricEmergency Medical ServicesFacilities and Services UtilizationFemaleHealth FacilitiesHumansInfant, NewbornInterrupted Time Series AnalysisKenyaMaternal HealthMaternal MortalityPatient Acceptance of Health CarePerinatal MortalityPregnancyFree maternity service policyKenyaMaternal health service program indicatorsPolicy implementation

Identifiers

PMID31492134
PMCPMC6729061
OpenAlexW2971739269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.