Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31492117›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2019

Participant retention in follow-up studies of prematurely born children.

Victoria MacBean, Simon B Drysdale, Sanja Zivanovic, Janet L Peacock, Anne Greenough

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Reply to C Pang and L Zhao.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Victoria MacBeanCentre for Human Performance, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Brunel University London, London, UK.
Simon B DrysdaleOxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Sanja ZivanovicDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Janet L PeacockSchool of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
Anne GreenoughNIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, UK. anne.greenough@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8672-5349
King's College London · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBBrunel University of London · GB

Funding

Department of Health 08/116/10KHP Challenge Fund N/AMedical Research Council MC_PC_14105NIHR Biomedical Research Centre based at Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFollow-up studies of infants born prematurely are essential to understand the long-term consequences of preterm birth and the efficacy of interventions delivered in the neonatal period. Retention of participants for follow-up studies, however, is challenging, with attrition rates of up to 70%. Our aim was to examine retention rates in two follow-up studies of prematurely born children and identify participant or study characteristics that were associated with higher attrition, and to discuss retention strategies with regard to the literature.

methodsData from children recruited at birth to one of two studies of prematurely born infants were assessed. The two studies were the United Kingdom Oscillation Study (UKOS, a randomised study comparing two modes of neonatal ventilation in infants born less than 29 weeks of gestational age (GA)), and an observational study examining the impact of viral lower respiratory tract infections in infancy in those born less than 36 weeks of GA (virus study). The UKOS participants, but not those in the virus study, had regularly been contacted throughout the follow-up period. UKOS subjects were followed up at 11 to 14 years of age and subjects in the virus study at 5-7 years of age. At follow up in both studies, pulmonary function and respiratory morbidity were assessed. Retention rates to follow-up in the two studies and baseline characteristics of those who were and were not retained were assessed.

resultsRetention was significantly higher in UKOS than the virus study (61% versus 35%, p < 0.0001). Subjects lost to UKOS follow up had greater deprivation scores (p < 0.001), a greater likelihood of intrauterine tobacco exposure (p = 0.001) and were more likely to be of non-white ethnicity (p < 0.001). In the virus study, those lost to follow-up had higher birth weights (p = 0.036) and were less likely to be oxygen dependent at hospital discharge (p = 0.003) or be part of a multiple birth (p = 0.048).

conclusionsHigher retention was demonstrated when there was regular contact in the follow-up period. Both social factors and initial illness severity affected the retention into follow-up studies of prematurely born infants, though these factors were not consistent across the two studies.

Indexed as

Follow-Up StudiesInfant, PrematurePatient ParticipationAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornLost to Follow-UpMaleObservational Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicUnited KingdomFollow-up studyPrematurityRecruitment

Identifiers

PMID31492117
PMCPMC6729033
OpenAlexW2971733887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.