ArticleBMC bioinformatics2019
Multiple-level biomedical event trigger recognition with transfer learning.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A biomedical event extraction method based on fine-grained and attention mechanism.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- AT-NeuroEAE: A Joint Extraction Model of Events With Attributes for Research Sharing-Oriented Neuroimaging Provenance Construction.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
- Chinese Emergency Event Recognition Using Conv-RDBiGRU Model.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAutomatic extraction of biomedical events from literature is an important task in the understanding biological systems, allowing for faster update of the latest discoveries automatically. Detecting trigger words which indicate events is a critical step in the process of event extraction, because following steps depend on the recognized triggers. The task in this study is to identify event triggers from the literature across multiple levels of biological organization. In order to achieve high performances, the machine learning based approaches, such as neural networks, must be trained on a dataset with plentiful annotations. However, annotations might be difficult to obtain on the multiple levels, and annotated resources have so far mainly focused on the relations and processes at the molecular level. In this work, we aim to apply transfer learning for multiple-level trigger recognition, in which a source dataset with sufficient annotations on the molecular level is utilized to improve performance on a target domain with insufficient annotations and more trigger types.
resultsWe propose a generalized cross-domain neural network transfer learning architecture and approach, which can share as much knowledge as possible between the source and target domains, especially when their label sets overlap. In the experiments, MLEE corpus is used to train and test the proposed model to recognize the multiple-level triggers as a target dataset. Two different corpora having the varying degrees of overlapping labels with MLEE from the BioNLP'09 and BioNLP'11 Shared Tasks are used as source datasets, respectively. Regardless of the degree of overlap, our proposed approach achieves recognition improvement. Moreover, its performance exceeds previously reported results of other leading systems on the same MLEE corpus.
conclusionsThe proposed transfer learning method can further improve the performance compared with the traditional method, when the labels of the source and target datasets overlap. The most essential reason is that our approach has changed the way parameters are shared. The vertical sharing replaces the horizontal sharing, which brings more sharable parameters. Hence, these more shared parameters between networks improve the performance and generalization of the model on the target domain effectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.