Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31491900›Full record

ArticleAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Antibiotic Prescribing by Informal Healthcare Providers for Common Illnesses: A Repeated Cross-Sectional Study in Rural India.

Shweta Khare, Manju Purohit, Megha Sharma, Ashok J Tamhankar, Cecilia Stalsby Lundborg, Vishal Diwan, Ashish Pathak

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Shweta KhareDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Global Health-Health Systems and Policy (HSP): Medicines Focusing Antibiotics, Karolinska Institutet, Tomtebodavagen 18A, SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden. shweta.khare@ki.se.
Manju PurohitDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Global Health-Health Systems and Policy (HSP): Medicines Focusing Antibiotics, Karolinska Institutet, Tomtebodavagen 18A, SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.
Megha SharmaDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Global Health-Health Systems and Policy (HSP): Medicines Focusing Antibiotics, Karolinska Institutet, Tomtebodavagen 18A, SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.
Ashok J TamhankarDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Global Health-Health Systems and Policy (HSP): Medicines Focusing Antibiotics, Karolinska Institutet, Tomtebodavagen 18A, SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.
Cecilia Stalsby LundborgDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Global Health-Health Systems and Policy (HSP): Medicines Focusing Antibiotics, Karolinska Institutet, Tomtebodavagen 18A, SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-6525-1861
Vishal DiwanDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Global Health-Health Systems and Policy (HSP): Medicines Focusing Antibiotics, Karolinska Institutet, Tomtebodavagen 18A, SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-7948-8579
Ashish PathakDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Global Health-Health Systems and Policy (HSP): Medicines Focusing Antibiotics, Karolinska Institutet, Tomtebodavagen 18A, SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-7576-895X
Karolinska Institutet · SEUppsala University · SE

Funding

Vetenskapsrådet 521-2012-2889
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Informal healthcare providers (IHCPs) are predominant healthcare providers in rural India, who prescribe without formal training. Antibiotic prescription by IHCPs could provide crucial information for controlling antibiotic resistance. The aim of this study is to determine the practices and seasonal changes in antibiotic prescribing for common illnesses by IHCPs. A repeated cross-sectional study was conducted over 18 months, covering different seasons in the rural demographic surveillance site, at Ujjain, India. Prescriptions given to outpatients by 12 IHCPs were collected. In total, 15,322 prescriptions for 323 different complaint combinations were analyzed, of which 11,336 (74%) included antibiotics. The results showed that 14,620 (95%) of antibiotics prescribed were broad spectrum and the most commonly prescribed were fluoroquinolones (4771,31%), followed by penicillin with an extended spectrum (4119,27%) and third-generation cephalosporin (3069,20%). Antibiotics were prescribed more frequently in oral and dental problems (1126,88%), fever (3569,87%), and upper respiratory tract infections (3273, 81%); more during the monsoon season (2350,76%); and more frequently to children (3340,81%) than to adults (7996,71%). The study concludes that antibiotics were the more commonly prescribed drugs compared to other medications for common illnesses, most of which are broad-spectrum antibiotics, a situation that warrants further investigations followed by immediate and coordinated efforts to reduce unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions by IHCPs.

Indexed as

antibioticsHealthcare providersIndiainfectious diseasesprescriptionrural population

Identifiers

PMID31491900
PMCPMC6783982
OpenAlexW2412749782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.