ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2019
Application of machine learning to structural connectome to predict symptom reduction in depressed adolescents with cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT).
Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Machine learning in the prediction of treatment response for emotional disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical psychology review · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence role in advancement of human brain connectome studies.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2024Pooled it
- Brain structural connectomic topology predicts medication response in youth with bipolar disorder: A randomized clinical trial.Journal of affective disorders · 2025Trial
- Neural mechanisms underlying cognitive inflexibility in obsessive-compulsive disorder: a review.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Review
- Neural mechanisms of guided internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy for children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a protocol for a prospective multimodal MRI study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Graph Neural Network Learning on the Pediatric Structural Connectome.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2025Article
- Translational Connectomics: overview of machine learning in macroscale Connectomics for clinical insights.BMC neurology · 2024Review
- Which client with generalized anxiety disorder benefits from a mindfulness ecological momentary intervention versus a self-monitoring app? Developing a multivariable machine learning predictive model.Journal of anxiety disorders · 2024Article
- Biomarkers associated with treatment outcome in young people with depression: A systematic review.Neuroscience applied · 2024Review
- Weighting the structural connectome: Exploring its impact on network properties and predicting cognitive performance in the human brain.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Classification of multiple sclerosis women with voiding dysfunction using machine learning: Is functional connectivity or structural connectivity a better predictor?BJUI compass · 2023Article
- Predicting non-improvement of symptoms in daily mental healthcare practice using routinely collected patient-level data: a machine learning approach.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Article
- Aberrant single-subject morphological brain networks in first-episode, treatment-naive adolescents with major depressive disorder.Psychoradiology · 2023Article
- Personalized Diagnosis and Treatment for Neuroimaging in Depressive Disorders.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Review
- A lateralized model of the pain-depression dyad.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2021Review
- MRI Insights Into Adolescent Neurocircuitry-A Vision for the Future.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeAdolescent major depressive disorder (MDD) is a highly prevalent, incapacitating and costly illness. Many depressed teens do not improve with cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), a first-line treatment for adolescent MDD, and face devastating consequences of increased risk of suicide and many negative health outcomes. "Who will improve with CBT?" is a crucial question that remains unanswered, and treatment planning for adolescent depression remains biologically unguided. The purpose of this study was to utilize machine learning applied to patients' brain imaging data in order to help predict depressive symptom reduction with CBT.
methodsWe applied supervised machine learning to diffusion MRI-based structural connectome data in order to predict symptom reduction in 30 depressed adolescents after three months of CBT. A set of 21 attributes was chosen, including the baseline depression score, age, gender, two global network properties, and node strengths of brain regions previously implicated in depression. The practical and robust J48 pruned tree classifier was utilized with a 10-fold cross-validation.
resultsThe classification resulted in an 83% accuracy of predicting depressive symptom reduction. The resulting tree of size seven with only three attributes highlights the role of the right thalamus in predicting depressive symptom reduction with CBT. Additional analysis showed a significant negative correlation between the change in the depressive symptoms and the node strength of the right thalamus.
conclusionsOur results demonstrate that a machine learning algorithm that exclusively uses structural connectome data and the baseline depression score can predict with a high accuracy depressive symptom reduction in adolescent MDD with CBT. This knowledge can help improve treatment planning for adolescent depression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.