Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31491055›Full record

ReviewMass spectrometry reviews2020

Emerging trends in paper spray mass spectrometry: Microsampling, storage, direct analysis, and applications.

Benjamin S Frey, Deidre E Damon, Abraham K Badu-Tawiah

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mass spectrometry reviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Rapid Screening of New Psychoactive Substances Using pDART-QqQ-MS.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Recent advances in facemask devices forTrends in analytical chemistry : TRAC · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Clinical Chemistry for Developing Countries: Mass Spectrometry.Annual review of analytical chemistry (Palo Alto, Calif.) · 2021
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Benjamin S FreyDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, 43210.
Deidre E DamonDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, 43210.
Abraham K Badu-TawiahDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, 43210.

Funding

Malaria Management through an On-demand Diagnostic Approach using Novel Ionic ProbesR01AI143809 · NIAID · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BADU-TAWIAH, ABRAHAM · 2019 to 2023
$1.3M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI143809
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advancements in the sensitivity of chemical instrumentation have led to increased interest in the use of microsamples for translational and biomedical research. Paper substrates are by far the most widely used media for biofluid collection, and mass spectrometry is the preferred method of analysis of the resultant dried blood spot (DBS) samples. Although there have been a variety of review papers published on DBS, there has been no attempt to unify the century old DBS methodology with modern applications utilizing modified paper and paper-based microfluidics for sampling, storage, processing, and analysis. This critical review will discuss how mass spectrometry has expanded the utility of paper substrates from sample collection and storage, to direct complex mixture analysis to on-surface reaction monitoring.

Indexed as

AnimalsDried Blood Spot TestingEquipment DesignHumansLab-On-A-Chip DevicesMass SpectrometrySpecimen Handlingambient ionizationdirect analysisdirect reaction monitoring by paper spraydried blood spot (DBS)mass spectrometrymicrofluidic devicesmicrosamplingpaper spray (PS)solid-phase extraction

Identifiers

PMID31491055
PMCPMC7875099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.