ArticlePloS one2019
Classification of early and late stage liver hepatocellular carcinoma patients from their genomics and epigenomics profiles.
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Uncovering myocardial infarction genetic signatures using GWAS exploration in Saudi and European cohorts.Scientific reports · 2023Pooled it
- Integrated Bioinformatics and Multi-Omics Analysis of ZBTB40 Expression, Prognostic Relevance, and Regulatory Networks in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Radiogenomics and machine learning in hepatocellular carcinoma: from foundations to clinical translation.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Review
- Comprehensive review of publicly accessible databases for gastrointestinal cancer and future challenges in database construction.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- CPSM: an R package for cancer patient survival risk model using transcriptomics and clinical data.GigaScience · 2026Article
- Pan-cancer analysis of HOMER1 in hepatocellular carcinoma revealing diagnostic potential and immune landscape with experimental validation.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Role of the USP family in autophagy regulation and cancer progression.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2025Review
- Comprehensive review and updated analysis of DNA methylation in hepatocellular carcinoma: From basic research to clinical application.Clinical and translational medicine · 2024Review
- Characterization of tumor suppressors and oncogenes evaluated from TCGA cancers.American journal of clinical and experimental immunology · 2024Article
- DecipheringEpigenomics · 2024Article
- The use of SP/Neurokinin-1 as a Therapeutic Target in Colon and Rectal Cancer.Current medicinal chemistry · 2024Review
- Review
- Key therapeutic targets implicated at the early stage of hepatocellular carcinoma identified through machine-learning approaches.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- In silico transcriptional analysis of asymptomatic and severe COVID-19 patients reveals the susceptibility of severe patients to other comorbidities and non-viral pathological conditions.Human gene (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2023Article
- Machine-learning algorithms based on personalized pathways for a novel predictive model for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- USP8 regulates liver cancer progression via the inhibition of TRAF6-mediated signal for NF-κB activation and autophagy induction by TLR4.Translational oncology · 2022Article
- Artificial intelligence in the detection, characterisation and prediction of hepatocellular carcinoma: a narrative review.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2022Review
- Utilizing Gut Microbiota to Improve Hepatobiliary Tumor Treatments: Recent Advances.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- Comprehensive Analysis on the Specific Role and Function of Mitochondrial Inner Membrane Protein MPV17 in Liver Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Genetics research · 2022Article
- Machine Learning in Epigenomics: Insights into Cancer Biology and Medicine.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Reviews on cancer · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLiver Hepatocellular Carcinoma (LIHC) is one of the major cancers worldwide, responsible for millions of premature deaths every year. Prediction of clinical staging is vital to implement optimal therapeutic strategy and prognostic prediction in cancer patients. However, to date, no method has been developed for predicting the stage of LIHC from the genomic profile of samples.
methodsThe Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset of 173 early stage (stage-I), 177 late stage (stage-II, Stage-III and stage-IV) and 50 adjacent normal tissue samples for 60,483 RNA transcripts and 485,577 methylation CpG sites, was extensively analyzed to identify the key transcriptomic expression and methylation-based features using different feature selection techniques. Further, different classification models were developed based on selected key features to categorize different classes of samples implementing different machine learning algorithms.
resultsIn the current study, in silico models have been developed for classifying LIHC patients in the early vs. late stage and cancerous vs. normal samples using RNA expression and DNA methylation data. TCGA datasets were extensively analyzed to identify differentially expressed RNA transcripts and methylated CpG sites that can discriminate early vs. late stages and cancer vs. normal samples of LIHC with high precision. Naive Bayes model developed using 51 features that combine 21 CpG methylation sites and 30 RNA transcripts achieved maximum MCC (Matthew's correlation coefficient) 0.58 with an accuracy of 78.87% on the validation dataset in discrimination of early and late stage. Additionally, the prediction models developed based on 5 RNA transcripts and 5 CpG sites classify LIHC and normal samples with an accuracy of 96-98% and AUC (Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve) 0.99. Besides, multiclass models also developed for classifying samples in the normal, early and late stage of cancer and achieved an accuracy of 76.54% and AUC of 0.86.
conclusionOur study reveals stage prediction of LIHC samples with high accuracy based on the genomics and epigenomics profiling is a challenging task in comparison to the classification of cancerous and normal samples. Comprehensive analysis, differentially expressed RNA transcripts, methylated CpG sites in LIHC samples and prediction models are available from CancerLSP (http://webs.iiitd.edu.in/raghava/cancerlsp/).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.